1991
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90260-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic relevance of cathepsin D versus oestrogen receptors in node negative breast cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was also a weak association of Cath D with both ER and PgR, as already found in several studies (Cazin et al, 1993;Gion et al, 1995), but not all (Granata et al, 1991). This study also confirmed the association of high Cath D level with SBR grade II and III previously reported (Cazin et al, 1993;Gion et al, 1995), as well as its correlation to pS2 (Gion et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There was also a weak association of Cath D with both ER and PgR, as already found in several studies (Cazin et al, 1993;Gion et al, 1995), but not all (Granata et al, 1991). This study also confirmed the association of high Cath D level with SBR grade II and III previously reported (Cazin et al, 1993;Gion et al, 1995), as well as its correlation to pS2 (Gion et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar results for early relapses in node negative patients have been obtained with her/neu oncogene (Slamon & Clark, 1988). Cathepsin D has also failed to predict disease-free survival in node negative patients, while its predictive value was considerably strengthened when combined with ER-determinations (Granata et al, 1991). Long term follow-up studies on stage I and node negative patients show that a recurrence can occur decades after the initial diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Oestrogen regulated genes are ideal candidates and we have previously described the cloning of eleven such genes (2-4). However, we and others (8, 14), have found that many genes originally isolated as oestrogen responsive in cell culture, fail to maintain this responsiveness in tumours where their expression is not correlated to ER status (14). It therefore appears likely that for the majority of oestrogen responsive genes the steroidal regulatory component can be circumvented by other stimulatory mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%