2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic potential of FOXP3 expression in non-small cell lung cancer cells combined with tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
142
2
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
12
142
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Tregs suppress or down-regulate induction and proliferation of effector T cells and have been found to be consistently observed at a high frequency in patients with HNSCC (19,20). Surprisingly, unlike other solid malignancies including lung cancer and renal cell cancer, the presence of Tregs has been found to correlate with good clinical outcome (21)(22)(23). Multiple functions of Tregs explain this paradox, including suppression of inflammation triggered by immune cells, elimination of macrophages that have a protumor effect in cancer development and induction of apoptosis (24).…”
Section: Immune System and Cancer Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tregs suppress or down-regulate induction and proliferation of effector T cells and have been found to be consistently observed at a high frequency in patients with HNSCC (19,20). Surprisingly, unlike other solid malignancies including lung cancer and renal cell cancer, the presence of Tregs has been found to correlate with good clinical outcome (21)(22)(23). Multiple functions of Tregs explain this paradox, including suppression of inflammation triggered by immune cells, elimination of macrophages that have a protumor effect in cancer development and induction of apoptosis (24).…”
Section: Immune System and Cancer Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the end, we reviewed 58 studies encompassing 16 different cancer types (Table 1), including bladder (19), breast (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28), cervical (29,30), colorectal (12,(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39), endometrial (40)(41)(42), gastric (14,(43)(44)(45)(46), head and neck (47), hepatocellular (48)(49)(50)(51)(52), lung (53,54), melanoma (55)(56)(57)(58), mesothelial (59), oral (4,(60)(61)(62)(63), ovarian (2,3,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In breast cancer, FOXP3 was found to be down regulated compared to normal tissue [36].FOXP3expression in melanoma or pancreatic tumor cells may have Treg like activity thus suppressing effector T cell activity [21].From these observations,it seems likely that FOXP3 expression does not influence carcinogenesis and cancer development in uniform manner but it has a rather cancer type-depended function [34]. In NSCLC, [37] found no significant relationship between Treg count and tumor FOXP3status.In their study,patients without tumor FOXP3 expression and high Treg count had significant worse overall and relapse-free survival than other groups. Study suggested that the different expression of FOXP3 in tumor cells and infiltrating lymphocytes is affected by factors present in the tumor microenvironment such as PGE2, COX-2 and TGF-β [9].…”
Section: Results and Discussion:-mentioning
confidence: 99%