2017
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic nomogram for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization following curative resection

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have mainly focused on the inflammation index converted from multiple serum inflammatory indicators, such as the NLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR). Nomogram clinical models based on inflammatory indicators such as NLR, PLR, hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and FC-score composed of fibrinogen and C-reactive protein are reported to have good predictive prognostic performances for HCC ( 7 , 17 19 ). In this study, several easily available inflammatory indicators were analyzed, including NLR, PLR, MLR, SIRI, and SII.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have mainly focused on the inflammation index converted from multiple serum inflammatory indicators, such as the NLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR). Nomogram clinical models based on inflammatory indicators such as NLR, PLR, hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and FC-score composed of fibrinogen and C-reactive protein are reported to have good predictive prognostic performances for HCC ( 7 , 17 19 ). In this study, several easily available inflammatory indicators were analyzed, including NLR, PLR, MLR, SIRI, and SII.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, we selected patients receiving R0 resection without p-TACE to establish a prediction model and then selected an external cohort including patients with or without p-TACE to verify whether the model could guide the application of p-TACE. Different from previous models [ 26 , 27 ], which selected patients receiving p-TACE to establish models directly, the methodology applied in this study had several advantages: 1) it decreased the interference of p-TACE because systematic reviews and meta-analyses failed to confirm a definite benefit of p-TACE [ 9 , 28 ]; and 2) it complied with the clinical treatment process completely because the surgical margin and postoperative pathology were the determinant factors of TACE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%