2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Indicators for Successful Low-intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the statistically significant increase in the IIEF-EF scores 6 months post-treatment (p = .001) as compared to the baseline scores in each patient group is consistent with the literature indicating that Li-SWT applications are effective in ED treatment (Adeldaeim et al, 2021;Raheem et al, 2020).…”
Section: Ta B L E 3 Comparison Of the Mean Iief-ef Score Increase Between Groups Based On Ed Gradessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the statistically significant increase in the IIEF-EF scores 6 months post-treatment (p = .001) as compared to the baseline scores in each patient group is consistent with the literature indicating that Li-SWT applications are effective in ED treatment (Adeldaeim et al, 2021;Raheem et al, 2020).…”
Section: Ta B L E 3 Comparison Of the Mean Iief-ef Score Increase Between Groups Based On Ed Gradessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Even though the application of regenerative therapies in humans is limited, the use of Li‐SWT and PRP is well known (Campbell et al., 2020). Although the mechanism of the treatment is unclear and a standardised treatment protocol is lacking, Li‐SWT is known to be safe and effective in the treatment of ED (Adeldaeim et al., 2021; Campbell et al., 2019). Moreover, it is a recommended treatment option in the EAU guidelines for ED and in patients with mild vasculogenic ED or poor responses to PDE5i (EAU Guidelines, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-energy shock waves have been used for the disintegration of urinary tract stones since 1980. Subsequently, several studies have reported the application of LESW to human tissue for the regeneration or repair of bones [ 24 ], muscles [ 25 ], and other soft tissues [ 26 , 27 ]. The advantages of shock waves are their noninvasiveness, ease of handling by clinicians, and the short-term treatment course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the study design is missing randomization and blinding, the long follow up and volume of patients, stratified by severity of ED, is worth noting. 34 To better identify the ideal LiSWT treatment, there have been a few studies that have compared various treatment protocols. Ramasamy et al performed a RCT comparing patients receiving 3,600 shocks over 1 week (n = 40) vs 2 weeks (n = 40) (Electromagnetic, MoreNova, DirexGroup, Israel, energy density of 0.09 mJ/mm 2 and frequency of 1Hz).…”
Section: Low-intensity Shock Wave Therapy (Liswt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the study design is missing randomization and blinding, the long follow up and volume of patients, stratified by severity of ED, is worth noting. 34 …”
Section: Low-intensity Shock Wave Therapy (Liswt)mentioning
confidence: 99%