2008
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa071098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Importance of Defibrillator Shocks in Patients with Heart Failure

Abstract: BACKGROUND-Patients with heart failure who receive an implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention (i.e., prevention of a first life-threatening arrhythmic event) may later receive therapeutic shocks from the ICD. Information about long-term prognosis after ICD therapy in such patients is limited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

27
830
14
18

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,289 publications
(889 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
27
830
14
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial generations of ICDs did not record and save electrograms (EGMs), leading to a reduced appreciation for the frequency and impact of inappropriate shocks. With the advent and then dominance of primary prevention indications, avoidable shocks assumed a relatively larger proportion of total therapy [78][79][80][81][82][83]. Gradually, publications have increased awareness of the frequency and the diverse range of adverse outcomes associated with avoidable ICD therapy, and have demonstrated that avoidable ICD shocks can be reduced by evidence-based programming of the detection rate, detection duration, antitachycardia pacing (ATP), algorithms that discriminate supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from VT, and specific programming to minimize the sensing of noise [81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92].…”
Section: Tachycardia Detection Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial generations of ICDs did not record and save electrograms (EGMs), leading to a reduced appreciation for the frequency and impact of inappropriate shocks. With the advent and then dominance of primary prevention indications, avoidable shocks assumed a relatively larger proportion of total therapy [78][79][80][81][82][83]. Gradually, publications have increased awareness of the frequency and the diverse range of adverse outcomes associated with avoidable ICD therapy, and have demonstrated that avoidable ICD shocks can be reduced by evidence-based programming of the detection rate, detection duration, antitachycardia pacing (ATP), algorithms that discriminate supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from VT, and specific programming to minimize the sensing of noise [81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92].…”
Section: Tachycardia Detection Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although therapies delivered by the ICD can abort SCD, appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks have been associated with a considerable increase in the risk of mortality [82,83,[155][156][157][158]. In the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCDHeFT), the risk of mortality was 5-fold higher in patients who received appropriate ICD shocks and 2-fold higher in patients who received inappropriate shocks [83].…”
Section: Tachycardia Therapy Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that the PHIV with an ICD were sicker for other reasons, such as concomitant infections/lower CD4 cell count, and therefore more likely to have an ICD discharge. There are no comparative prior data on ICD discharge among PHIV; however, we can compare our findings from the uninfected control group to ICD discharge rates among people without known HIV 43, 44, 45. We noted an ICD discharge rate of 23% among uninfected controls over 19 months of follow‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although ICD shocks could terminate those arrhythmias immediately, they would result in both physical and psychological damages and even increase the mortality and hospitalization as proved in some previous studies 2, 3, 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%