2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0347(200012)22:8<794::aid-hed8>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic implications of mandibular invasion in oral cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
3
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
45
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…at ASPET Journals on May 12, 2018 molpharm.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from are known for their ability to promote osteolysis (Ash et al, 2000). As expected, RANKL increased cell migration across the membrane by 100% (Fig.…”
Section: Hts System For Agents Regulating Gene Expression 923supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…at ASPET Journals on May 12, 2018 molpharm.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from are known for their ability to promote osteolysis (Ash et al, 2000). As expected, RANKL increased cell migration across the membrane by 100% (Fig.…”
Section: Hts System For Agents Regulating Gene Expression 923supporting
confidence: 62%
“…As mentioned above, MMP-9 also contributes to bone resorption with some osteolytic malignancies including breast, multiple myeloma, and oral cancers (Ash et al, 2000;Van Valckenborgh et al, 2004;Guise et al, 2005). For cancers metastatic to the bone, osteoclasts and their precursors (macrophage lineage) rather than cancer cells express MMP-9 in response to cytokines, including receptor activator of nuclear factor-B ligand (RANKL), resulting in bone lysis, cancer cell colonization/growth, and further recruitment of preosteoclasts to the remodeling bone (Guise et al, 2005).…”
Section: Integration Of An Mmp-9 Promoter Into An Openmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These findings differ from those of previous studies that distinguished between cortical and medullary invasion, but found no prognostic significance on multivariate analyses. 5,10 This may reflect differences in covariate selection and limited statistical power (type II error), as both studies had small sample size in comparison with the current analysis. Interestingly, when bone invasion was classified as simply present or absent, it was not a significant independent predictor of overall (P ¼ .225) or disease-specific survival (P ¼ .221).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Whereas some authors have reported an association with adverse outcomes on univariate analysis, [3][4][5][6][7] other studies did not support this finding. [8][9][10] Furthermore, multivariate analyses taking into account potential confounding factors such as tumor size and involved margins have suggested that bone invasion is not an independent predictor of survival. [4][5][6] Unfortunately, the majority of the studies to date were limited by small sample sizes and failed to distinguish between cortical and medullary bone invasion, making reliable conclusions difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A and B) (4)(5)(6). Gingival SCC may eventually directly invade the mandible, a feature associated with a worse prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%