Abstract:Loss of hMLH1 expression is an independent predicator of improved survival in this series and perhaps the underlying cause of the observed survival difference associated with p53 expression.
“…A study by Gao et al demonstrated that tumor location was an independent protective survival indicator in mucinous adenocarcinoma (which is commoner in the proximal colon) -i.e. poorer outcome for rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma compared to right-sided mucinous adenocarcinoma[83].By exclusively considering the factors predicting survival in RCC, Smyth et al showed that loss of hMLH1 expression (leading to MSI positive tumor) was an independent predictor for improved survival, whereas aberrant p53 expression had no correlation to outcome[84].Meta-analysis by Guastadisegni et al has shown that MSI positive CRCs have better overalloutcome compared to microsatellite stable CRCs[85].Despite RCC being more likely to be MSI positive, the overall outcome and survival is still poor in RCC. To determine the independent factors contributing to poorer outcome in RCC, Phipps et al correlated MSI status with the oncological outcomes of over 3000 CRC patients according to the subsite.…”
“…A study by Gao et al demonstrated that tumor location was an independent protective survival indicator in mucinous adenocarcinoma (which is commoner in the proximal colon) -i.e. poorer outcome for rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma compared to right-sided mucinous adenocarcinoma[83].By exclusively considering the factors predicting survival in RCC, Smyth et al showed that loss of hMLH1 expression (leading to MSI positive tumor) was an independent predictor for improved survival, whereas aberrant p53 expression had no correlation to outcome[84].Meta-analysis by Guastadisegni et al has shown that MSI positive CRCs have better overalloutcome compared to microsatellite stable CRCs[85].Despite RCC being more likely to be MSI positive, the overall outcome and survival is still poor in RCC. To determine the independent factors contributing to poorer outcome in RCC, Phipps et al correlated MSI status with the oncological outcomes of over 3000 CRC patients according to the subsite.…”
“…The MMR defective tumours (Group 3) all demonstrated normal p53 expression, which is a recognized association of the mutator pathway [4,11]. This group of tumours demonstrated very few chromosomal aberrations with a median of 4 (range 0 Á/11) gross alterations, as described previously [12,13] and did not exhibit common deletions on 18q and 17p.…”
“…A trend for improved overall survival for patients with p53 mutations in distal colonic carcinomas analyzed by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP) was also shown (23). Other studies reported an unfavourable prognosis in patients with p53-positive carcinomas (12,13,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28), but only few multivariate analyses yielded a significant result in these studies (25). However, other authors did not found a correlation of p53 and prognosis (11,16,29,30).…”
Abstract. There is no clear evidence on the prognostic and predictive value of abnormal p53 expression in colorectal cancer. The major downstream protein, p21, a cell cycle inhibitor, is transcriptionally regulated by p53. The prognostic impact of p21 expression in colorectal carcinomas is still under debate. In this study, we investigated the expression of p21 and p53 in a prospective cohort of 116 sporadic colorectal carcinomas at UICCII/III stage. We observed an expression of p21 in 26% and p53 in 63% of the carcinomas by immunohistochemistry. Patients with p21-negative colorectal carcinomas had a significant better recurrence-free and overall survival than patients with p21-positive carcinomas (p=0.02 and p=0.005). Expression of p53 was related to a better overall survival (p=0.048). The combination of p21-negative/p53-positive expression was significantly related to better recurrence-free and overall survival (p=0.007 and p=0.0001) and gained independent prognostic significance (HR: 3.4, p=0.01). Moreover, patients with combined p21 -/p53 + expression had a remarkable benefit in overall survival after adjuvant chemotherapy as compared to the p21 -/p53 -subgroup (HR: 3.6, p=0.027). Our data suggest that the assessment of both p53 and p21 expression may provide prognostic information in colorectal cancer patients. This combination might be helpful to identify patients who could benefit from chemotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.