those with INTERMACS profile 1, 4 the paracorporeal pulsatile LVAD implantation (Nipro VAD or AB5000), a counterpart of the Thoratec PVAD (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA, USA), has long been used as a strategy for bridge-todecision or -candidacy, followed by conversion to durable LVAD as a bridge-to-transplantation (i.e., secondary device) if applicable. Recently, an extracorporeal continuousflow centrifugal pump (RotaFlow, Gyro pump, or Mera pump), which is a counterpart of CentriMag (Levitronix LLC, Waltham, MA, USA), has replaced almost all paracorporeal pulsatile LVADs, because of having fewer adverse events. In addition, central extracorporeal membranous G iven the improvement of mechanical assist device technology and increasingly sophisticated perioperative management, the mortality and morbidity following durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation have greatly improved, particularly among those with stable preoperative hemodynamics dependent on continuous inotropes who typically are classified as INTERMACS profile 3. 1,2 However, optimal therapeutic strategies for those with clinical deterioration assigned to INTERMACS profile 1 remain controversial. 3 Based on the guidelines from Japanese academic societies, which do not recommend durable LVAD implantation for