Prognostic Implication of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Colorectal Cancers: Comparison Depending on Tumor Location

Abstract

Background: The proportion of the number of involved lymph nodes (LNs) to the number of examined LNs—defined as metastatic LN ratio (mLNR)—has been considered as a prognostic parameter. This study aims to elucidate the prognostic implication of the mLNR in colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the tumor location. Methods: We evaluated the correlation between prognoses and the involved and examined LNs as well as mLNR according to the tumor location in 266 surgically resected human CRCs. Besides, to evaluate the optimal cutoff for high and low mLNRs, we investigated the correlation between mLNR and survival according to the various cutoffs. Results: LN metastasis was found in 146 cases (54.9%), and colon and rectal cancers were found in 116 (79.5%) and 30 (20.5%) of the cases, respectively. The mean mLNRs were significantly higher in rectal cancer than in colon cancer (0.38 ± 0.28 vs. 0.21 ± 0.24, P = 0.003). Besides this, the number of involved LNs in rectal cancer was significantly high compared to colon cancer (11.83 ± 10.92 vs. 6.37 ± 7.78, P = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference in the examined LNs between the rectal and colon cancers (31.90 ± 12.28 vs. 36.60 ± 18.11, P = 0.181). In colon cancer, a high mLNR was significantly correlated with worse survival for all cutoffs (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4). However, rectal cancer only showed a significant correlation between high mLNR and worse survival in the subgroup with a cutoff of 0.2. Conclusions: Our results showed that high mLNR was significantly correlated with worse survival. The number of involved LNs and mLNRs were significantly higher in rectal cancer than in colon cancer. The cutoff of 0.2 can be useful for the differentiation of prognostic groups, regardless of tumor location.

Development and external validation of a predictive scoring system associated with metastasis of T1‐2 colorectal tumors to lymph nodes

“…Diverse features, such as anatomical morphology, immune microenvironment, and molecular pathological characteristics, exist. A previous study associated malignant tumor sites with LNM in CRC patients 24 . Patients with left CRC had a notably higher rate of LNM, which was also supposed by this research.…”

Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?

“…In patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer, the higher the number of harvested lymph nodes, the better the oncological prognosis. The ratio of the involved lymph nodes to the harvested lymph nodes was identified as a strong prognostic indicator in stage III patients [ 64 , 65 ]. Although it is true that the removal of more lymph nodes by extended radical lymph node dissection is reflecting favorable prognosis, it requires considerable caution in interpreting this correlation as a cause-and-effect relationship.…”

A comprehensive analysis of the MAGE family as prognostic and diagnostic markers for hepatocellular carcinoma

“…All of the ve pivotal proteins, RNF14 FBXO4 FBXO22 TRIM36 and UBE2G2, were ubiquitin ligase. In g.8D, there were 17 members in network 3, most of them were also related with G-protein coupled activity and the regulation of cellular signal transduction and cell communication [31,32]. MLNR NMBR GPR132 HTR2C and LTB4R2, the ve pivotal proteins in network 3, were all protein receptors related with G-protein.…”