2006
DOI: 10.1253/circj.70.1332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Impact of Ventilatory Efficiency in Heart Disease Patients With Preserved Exercise Tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• E/V • CO2 slope, which ranges from approximately 24-34 in normal subjects, 16,[25][26][27][28] becomes steeper with the severity of heart failure. 25,27,29 The slope of ∆V…”
Section: Indexes Of Cpx Testingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…• E/V • CO2 slope, which ranges from approximately 24-34 in normal subjects, 16,[25][26][27][28] becomes steeper with the severity of heart failure. 25,27,29 The slope of ∆V…”
Section: Indexes Of Cpx Testingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Impaired cardiovascular response in heart failure patients leads to a prolonged time constant (τ on) and the prognosis for patients with abnormal parameters is poor. [20][21][22] CPX parameters related to the severity of heart failure are shown in Table VI. Detecting the state of autonomic function -Heart rate analysis: In heart disease, the state of autonomic nerve function is an important factor for determining the prognosis.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Besides the classical risk factors such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV symptoms and neurohormonal markers, peak oxygen consumption (V • O2) was found to predict survival in patients with CHF. 5,6 Recently, the V• E/V • CO2 slope was shown to be a better prognostic indicator than peak V• O2, [7][8][9] suggesting that improvement in the slope could be used as an indicator of prolonged survival of patients with CHF.Large clinical trials have established that -blockers improve left ventricular function and the survival of patients with CHF. [10][11][12][13] Several studies have compared metoprolol with carvedilol for treating patients with mild to moderate CHF, [14][15][16][17] and some have shown that carvedilol is more efficacious than metoprolol in improving LVEF and hemodynamic parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• O2, [7][8][9] suggesting that improvement in the slope could be used as an indicator of prolonged survival of patients with CHF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%