2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic impact of tumor volumetry in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck carcinoma (non-nasopharyngeal) treated by radiotherapy alone or combined radiochemotherapy in a randomized trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
52
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent studies, MNV and primary tumor volume were reported to play important roles in predicting prognosis [8,9,20,21]. In an analysis of 79 HNSCC patients who underwent primary irradiation or chemoradiation, MNV was the most important prognostic factor for the control of pathological nodes in the neck [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent studies, MNV and primary tumor volume were reported to play important roles in predicting prognosis [8,9,20,21]. In an analysis of 79 HNSCC patients who underwent primary irradiation or chemoradiation, MNV was the most important prognostic factor for the control of pathological nodes in the neck [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an analysis of 79 HNSCC patients who underwent primary irradiation or chemoradiation, MNV was the most important prognostic factor for the control of pathological nodes in the neck [20]. Another study on 94 HNSCC patients showed that not only the total tumor volume (primary tumor volume plus MNV) but also the MNV were significant prognostic factors for OS [21]. Furthermore, these prior studies may suggest that the MNV plays an important role in predicting prognosis in CUP patients who have no primary tumor burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the established predictive value of metastatic disease (lymph nodal and distant), we looked at the influence of stage at presentation on patient outcome but did not find any significant correlation. Although a larger tumor size at presentation has a negative influence on patient outcome (30), there is evidence that the extent of hypoxia does not correlate with tumor size (19,29). Our multivariate analysis took into account the tumor and node status as well as T stage in evaluating the influence of FMISO-PET.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we can expect that tumor burden, a threedimensional volumetric measurement, may be more reliable for the assessment of tumor extent, and serve as a better independent prognostic factor than pT stage [14]. Plataniotis et al [29] found that GTV correlated with treatment outcomes for patients with locally advanced HNSCC treated with radiation therapy or radiation therapy plus chemo therapy. Several authors also reported that GTV obtained from CT scan was a significant predictor for clinical outcome in the treatment of HNSCC [10,[30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%