2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05822-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic impact of sustained new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be that cardiac arrhythmias reflects disease severity directly (eg cardiac involvement and/or endogenous catecholamines) or indirectly (eg consequences of the life‐supportive interventions) or increases mortality in itself or that the interventions used against arrhythmias cause serious adverse events. The potential causalities around this, if any, are still debated in critically ill patients in general 26‐32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be that cardiac arrhythmias reflects disease severity directly (eg cardiac involvement and/or endogenous catecholamines) or indirectly (eg consequences of the life‐supportive interventions) or increases mortality in itself or that the interventions used against arrhythmias cause serious adverse events. The potential causalities around this, if any, are still debated in critically ill patients in general 26‐32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposed mechanisms include direct toxic effect on the cardiac electric system, augmented loading imposed on cardiomyocytes, inflammation, sympathetic hyperactivity, ischemia and pharmacological agents, including antibiotics. AF occurrence is associated with worse short and long term outcomes in patients with infections [26,27], directly influencing patient management, namely the decision to initiate anticoagulation, and conditioning rhythm or rate control strategies.…”
Section: Cardiac Rhythm Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both the previous randomized trial and the present trial examined the hospitalization period as a secondary endpoint because of the insufficient sample size. In a recent study, sustained AF led to a high mortality rate and longer length of ICU stay in noncardiac patients in the ICU [23]. These post-esophagectomy outcomes are also important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%