2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Chronic Total Occlusion in Acute and Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) has gained increasing clinical attention as the most advanced form of coronary artery disease. Prior studies already indicated a clear association of CTO with adverse clinical outcomes, especially in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and concomitant CTO of the non-infarct-related coronary artery (non-IRA). Nevertheless, the prognostic impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of CTO in the acute setting during AMI is still controversial. Due to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In patients with AMI, the presence of concurrent CTO is associated with increased mortality 3,6 . The pathological mechanisms involved include aggravated ischemia caused by occlusion of IRA and subsequent interruption of collateral supply to non‐IRA CTO, microvascular ischemia, reperfusion injury, and electrical instability, which may lead to poorer outcomes in these patients compared with patients who suffered from CTO and stable CAD 25 . Theoretically, revascularization of non‐IRA CTO after IRA PCI might yield more clinical benefits, as the recovery of blood supply in both the CTO territory and overlapping border of the infarct zone may reduce left ventricular remodeling and improve contractile function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with AMI, the presence of concurrent CTO is associated with increased mortality 3,6 . The pathological mechanisms involved include aggravated ischemia caused by occlusion of IRA and subsequent interruption of collateral supply to non‐IRA CTO, microvascular ischemia, reperfusion injury, and electrical instability, which may lead to poorer outcomes in these patients compared with patients who suffered from CTO and stable CAD 25 . Theoretically, revascularization of non‐IRA CTO after IRA PCI might yield more clinical benefits, as the recovery of blood supply in both the CTO territory and overlapping border of the infarct zone may reduce left ventricular remodeling and improve contractile function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease of HSP70 from day 1 to day 7 after the acute insult of MI may result from circulating HSP70 shifting into the dying cells at the ischemic site, imposing intracellular protective effects, which remains to be validated. The formation of CTO lesion is with concomitant coronary collateral circulation development ( 23 ), which to some extent offers benefits for sustaining the oxygen supply in ischemic sites of the myocardium. Besides, the complex mechanisms underlying CTO formation also underscore the long-term ischemia-related myocardial stunning ( 23 ), which is characterized by the altered expression of metabolic and prosurvival proteins ( 24 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of CTO lesion is with concomitant coronary collateral circulation development ( 23 ), which to some extent offers benefits for sustaining the oxygen supply in ischemic sites of the myocardium. Besides, the complex mechanisms underlying CTO formation also underscore the long-term ischemia-related myocardial stunning ( 23 ), which is characterized by the altered expression of metabolic and prosurvival proteins ( 24 ). Thus, the increased level of HSP70 from the acute phase of infarction to CTO may implicate the possible “prosurvival” role of HSP70 in the development of collateral connections and myocardial hibernation, which needs to be proven in experimental models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no clear evidence about the clinical benefit of revascularization of concurrent CTO in AMI patients, the available data are in favor of a complete coronary revascularization[ 40 , 41 ]. A possible explanation for the conflicting results in this setting, could be that the timing of the revascularization procedure following primary PCI must be individualized on the basis of the clinical characteristics of each patient; the application of a standardized timing in this complex clinical and procedural setting cannot be generalized.…”
Section: Acute Myocardial Infarction With Concomitant Chronic Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%