2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.752018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Impact of Pattern of Mandibular Involvement in Gingivo-Buccal Complex Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Marrow and Mandibular Canal Staging System

Abstract: PurposeTo study the pattern of mandibular involvement and its impact on oncologic outcomes in patients with gingivo-buccal complex squamous cell carcinoma (GBC-SCC) and propose a staging system based on the pattern of bone involvement (MMC: Marrow and mandibular canal staging system) and compare its performance with the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8).MethodsThis retrospective observational study included treatment-naïve GBC-SCC patients who underwent preoperative computed tomogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct tumor invasion through the bone is the most common scenario [ 32 ] and can be accurately covered by LIBS-based differentiation of healthy bone and bone-infiltrating tumor tissue, as previously shown [ 20 ]. However, 20% of bone-infiltrating tumors grow along the inferior alveolar nerve [ 32 ], and 43% of all bone-infiltrating tumors exhibit radiological involvement of the bony nerve canal, which is associated with poor survival [ 37 ]. According to the interpretation of the current study results, LIBS-based tissue discrimination appears to ensure the differentiation between cell-rich tumor areas and the inferior alveolar nerve with a sensitivity of ≥95.2% and a specificity of ≥87.2%, based on the intracellular detection of Ca and K. In the concrete intraoperative implementation of LIBS-guided feedback control, the performance of pairwise tissue discrimination would ultimately have to be summarized on a metric scale, as shown in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct tumor invasion through the bone is the most common scenario [ 32 ] and can be accurately covered by LIBS-based differentiation of healthy bone and bone-infiltrating tumor tissue, as previously shown [ 20 ]. However, 20% of bone-infiltrating tumors grow along the inferior alveolar nerve [ 32 ], and 43% of all bone-infiltrating tumors exhibit radiological involvement of the bony nerve canal, which is associated with poor survival [ 37 ]. According to the interpretation of the current study results, LIBS-based tissue discrimination appears to ensure the differentiation between cell-rich tumor areas and the inferior alveolar nerve with a sensitivity of ≥95.2% and a specificity of ≥87.2%, based on the intracellular detection of Ca and K. In the concrete intraoperative implementation of LIBS-guided feedback control, the performance of pairwise tissue discrimination would ultimately have to be summarized on a metric scale, as shown in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the review concluded that cortical involvement alone did not decrease OS but only the medullary involvement had such an effect. t 27 Mahajan et al, 28 in a new proposal for a staging classification, observed that cortical bone erosion may not affect survival and that only medullary invasion affects prognosis. In our study, among the 24 cases, 8 had bone involvement, and only 2 patients had verified complete medullary invasion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical resection is possible in disease with involvement of low infratemporal fossa (ITF) or retroantral ITF and superficial or deep cortical bony erosion. 18 26 Detailed explanation of the all the above entities is beyond the scope of this article. CECT has its own disadvantages like less soft tissue resolution compared to CE-MRI, which can be used as a problem-solving tool in detecting subtle lesions, or for demonstrating perineural or intracranial spread.…”
Section: Imaging Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%