2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.1205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Impact of BNP Variations in Patients Admitted for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with In-Hospital Worsening Renal Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four prospective studies were identified in the meta-analysis, while the other 9 studies were retrospective or post hoc studies. Most studies regarded WRF as an increase in creatinine of >0.3 mg/dl from baseline, except studies by Stolfo et al 24 and Testani et al, 21 in which WRF was defined as a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate of $20%. The definition of decongestion varied by study.…”
Section: Study Characteristics and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four prospective studies were identified in the meta-analysis, while the other 9 studies were retrospective or post hoc studies. Most studies regarded WRF as an increase in creatinine of >0.3 mg/dl from baseline, except studies by Stolfo et al 24 and Testani et al, 21 in which WRF was defined as a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate of $20%. The definition of decongestion varied by study.…”
Section: Study Characteristics and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognosis of patients with AHF was initially thought to be worse in those with WRF than in those without WRF based on several observational studies [5]. However, subsequent studies have clearly shown that the clinical and prognostic implications of WRF were not always straightforward [6][7][8]. Moreover, it has been suggested that the timing of WRF assessment can alter its prognosis; in trials that defined WRF in the acute phase, WRF was not a simple prognostic marker.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of loop diuretics causes worsening renal function (WRF), which has been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis in patients with AHF [5]. This association, however, does not always hold, as several recent studies have shown that the prognostic impact of WRF varies according to the clinical context in which it occurs [6][7][8]. More specifically, WRF occurring during successful decongestive treatment is not associated with a poor prognosis, whereas WRF occurring during an unfavorable clinical course is associated with a poor prognosis [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently, creatinine, BUN and estimated GFR are independent predictors of prognosis [40]. However, WRF occurs frequently during uptitration of diuretic treatment in case of clinical congestion and is not necessarily related to poor outcomes [35]. In idiopathic DCM, renal failure occurs in 20% of patients during the first 8 years after diagnosis, up to 50% at 20-year follow-up [59].…”
Section: Biomarkers and Dilated Cardiomyopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the evaluation of their plasmatic concentration on hospital admission is predictive of outcome in patients with acute HF, and their increase despite optimized therapy in chronic HF predicts morbidity and mortality [34]. Moreover, in the setting of acute decompensated HF, the occurrence of WRF with a significant decrease of BNP is a marker of adequate decongestion and favourable outcome [35]. Few studies investigated the role of natriuretic peptides in the peculiar setting of idiopathic DCM.…”
Section: Biomarkers and Dilated Cardiomyopathymentioning
confidence: 99%