1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the perspective of molecular biology

Abstract: Recent developments in molecular biology have revealed that several oncogenes, suppressor genes and adhesion molecules are involved in the development of oesophageal cancer; however, the role of these genes is still unknown. To evaluate which molecular biological factors are related to patients' prognosis and recurrence, we checked p53, p16, p21/Waf1, cyclin D1, Ki-67, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Mdm2, Bcl2, E-cadherin and MRP1/CD9 by means of immunohisto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
44
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In both MDM2 and Tp53 immunostainings, cases of positive cells of 10% or more were regarded as positive, and cases of positive cells of less than 10% were categorized as negative. The cut-off points adopted to distinguish between positivity and negativity were defined as previously described [3,27,33,42,47,48]. The Ki-67 labeling index was calculated by counting positive cells among 1000 nuclei.…”
Section: Assessment Of Immunoreactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both MDM2 and Tp53 immunostainings, cases of positive cells of 10% or more were regarded as positive, and cases of positive cells of less than 10% were categorized as negative. The cut-off points adopted to distinguish between positivity and negativity were defined as previously described [3,27,33,42,47,48]. The Ki-67 labeling index was calculated by counting positive cells among 1000 nuclei.…”
Section: Assessment Of Immunoreactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esophageal tumors show extensive local invasion and frequent spread to metastatic sites, posing a major challenge to effective management of the disease. Prediction of tumor angiogenesis by analysis of novel molecular prognostic markers might aid in developing more effective therapeutic strategies for better patient care (Shimada et al 1999;Hosch et al 2001). However, none of the molecular markers yet identified has shown unequivocal prognostic utility in EC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive criterion for immunohistochemical staining The intensity of immunohistochemical staining was evaluated in ®ve areas of the slide sections for correlation and con®rmation of the tissue analysis with speci®c criteria for each protein (Bukholm et al 1997;Gaur et al 1997;Shimada et al 1999). The results were evaluated semiquantitatively and graded on a 4-point scale on the basis of percentage of positively stained cells; ()) = immunostained positive cells not detected; (+1) = <10%; (+2) = 10± 20%; (+3) = 20±40%; (+4) = >40%.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%