2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors in Thymic Epithelial Tumors Undergoing Complete Resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the patients with type B1 disease succumbed. Type A, AB and B1 disease, thus, had more favorable outcomes than type B2 and B3, consistent with the results of previous studies (11)(12)(13)15,16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…None of the patients with type B1 disease succumbed. Type A, AB and B1 disease, thus, had more favorable outcomes than type B2 and B3, consistent with the results of previous studies (11)(12)(13)15,16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, tumor invasiveness, recurrence, completeness of resection, and tumor-related death can occur more frequently in types AB, B2, B3, and C than in types A and B1. Others have determined that a simplified system wherein TETs are divided into only 2 types, WHO-type A/AB/B1 and WHO-type B2/B3/C, predicts prognosis and optimal therapy more consistently (8)(9)(10). In light of these findings, we have opted to analyze our data by pooling TETs using the 2-type histologic grading system rather than the 6-type WHO histologic criteria.…”
Section: Tissue Specimensmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The modified Masaoka staging system is currently the most commonly employed scoring method, but its value is limited by the fact that it assigns scores only for specific macroscopic surgical, but not histologic, characteristics (1), making it difficult to reliably assess tumor severity in patients (2)(3)(4). The introduction in 1999 of the World Health Organization (WHO) histologic criteria (5), which scores tumor severity on the basis of epithelial cell morphology and the lymphocyte-to-epithelial cell ratio, stratified TETs into 6 entity types, A, AB, B1, B2, B3, and C, and provided a new means of predicting states of malignancy of TETs; however, controversies surrounding its accuracy still exist (2)(3)(4)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). The insufficiencies of current staging systems are confounded by the fact that no genetic or epigenetic prognostic indicators have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MG varlığı, ileri yaş, tümör çapı (≥8 cm), hücre siklus protein ekspresyonu gibi birçok faktör ek prognostik faktör (PF) olarak tanım-lanmıştır (27)(28)(29) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified