2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04063-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma—beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate evidence on prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in clinical stage I nonseminoma patients other than lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Methods We performed a systematic literature search in the biomedical databases Medline (via Ovid) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (search period January 2010 to February 2021) for full text publications in English and German language, reporting on retro- or prospectiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, only one (imaging) modality and the circulating tumour markers (β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were used in this study. In stage I seminoma, among other prognostic factors such as rete testis or lymphovascular invasion, tumour size is the most valuable prognostic factor for relapse (77,78). Our study included solely clinical and laboratory parameters that can be collected easily, quickly, and non-invasively so that a preoperative risk assessment of the individual patient can already be made at the time of CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, only one (imaging) modality and the circulating tumour markers (β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were used in this study. In stage I seminoma, among other prognostic factors such as rete testis or lymphovascular invasion, tumour size is the most valuable prognostic factor for relapse (77,78). Our study included solely clinical and laboratory parameters that can be collected easily, quickly, and non-invasively so that a preoperative risk assessment of the individual patient can already be made at the time of CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, only one (imaging) modality and the circulating tumour markers β-HCG and AFP were used in this study. Among other prognostic factors, such as lymphovascular or rete testis invasion, tumour size is the most valuable prognostic factor for early-stage seminoma relapse [65,66]. Our study included solely clinical and laboratory parameters that can be collected easily, quickly, and non-invasively so that a preoperative risk assessment of the individual patient can already be made at the time of CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment and prognosis of testicular germ cell tumors is based on primary tumor (T-stage), reginal lymph node (N-stage), distant metastases (M-stage), serum tumor markers (S-stage), as well as the distinctions between seminoma and non-seminoma germ ell tumors [ 1 , 2 ]. The impact of histological subtypes within the non-seminoma germ cell tumor, specifically regarding pure embryonal carcinoma as a risk factor for recurrence in stage I patients, has been addressed in previous studies [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. However, the effect of pure embryonal carcinoma vs. mixed germ cell tumor, especially in advanced testicular cancer (stages II and III), on survival is not well established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%