2002
DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.3.1037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

22
331
2
23

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 510 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 223 publications
22
331
2
23
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Our selected group of patients was validated by integrating newly studied markers with significant factors identified in earlier studies, such as tumor lymph node metastasis (TNM) staging system parameters. 16,20 The stage of disease and the lymph node involvement were correlated with patient survival in both univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, a fact that supports the accurate representation of our TMA samples. Lee et al 9 studied 115 cases of NSCLC (3 cm or less in size) for E-cad and catenins expressions using IHC.…”
Section: Study Of Altered E-cad and Egfr Expressions G Deeb Et Alsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…19 Our selected group of patients was validated by integrating newly studied markers with significant factors identified in earlier studies, such as tumor lymph node metastasis (TNM) staging system parameters. 16,20 The stage of disease and the lymph node involvement were correlated with patient survival in both univariate and multivariate statistical analyses, a fact that supports the accurate representation of our TMA samples. Lee et al 9 studied 115 cases of NSCLC (3 cm or less in size) for E-cad and catenins expressions using IHC.…”
Section: Study Of Altered E-cad and Egfr Expressions G Deeb Et Alsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Therefore, a substantial amount of research on the biology of NSCLC has focused on evaluating the potential of new molecular markers present in tumour cells to serve as prognostic factors or possible targets for therapy. Although a variety of molecular markers have been implicated in the prognosis of NSCLC, conflicting results were widely reported in the literature (Brundage et al, 2002). Thus, further investigations are required to develop appropriate markers (PCIo10%); (D) high-level expression of ADC (PCI ¼ 80%); magnification 1 Â 10; detection of Rad51 protein by immunohistochemistry using the monoclonal anti-Rad51 antibody 1G8 ; counterstaining with Hemalum; red arrows mark tumour cells expressing high levels of Rad51.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the prognosis of patients, clinical markers that may predict the prognosis and response to the specific therapy should be established. Tumour staging and performance status have been consistently shown to be the most powerful prognostic tool for survival rates of NSCLC patients (Brundage et al, 2002). The prognostic factors such as 'N' factor, tumour size, sex, and vessel invasion have been shown to determine overall outcome in patients with surgically resected NSCLC (Brundage et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%