1953
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.16.4.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Factors in Electric Convulsive Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18,20,24,25,43,48 In these studies, traits such as neuroticism, emotional lability, histrionic attitude, and the like, did predict less optimal ECT outcomes. Unfortunately, this early line of research has not been followed up.…”
Section: Methodologic Problems Of the Ect/melancholia Literature And mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…17,18,20,24,25,43,48 In these studies, traits such as neuroticism, emotional lability, histrionic attitude, and the like, did predict less optimal ECT outcomes. Unfortunately, this early line of research has not been followed up.…”
Section: Methodologic Problems Of the Ect/melancholia Literature And mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hier zeigte sich allgemein eine starke Korrelation eines hohen HIS-Wertes mit negativem Therapieerfolg bzw. im Speziellen ein signifikant negativ prädiktiver Wert der Merkmale "Hypochondrie", "Depersonalisation", "Affektlabilität", "Hysterische Züge", "Neurotizismus im Erwachsenenalter" für die Response auf die EKT [11]. Diese Merkmale zeigen eine hohe Übereinstimmung mit der Cluster B Persönlichkeitsstruktur, aus der später die Abgrenzung der BPS erfolgte (DSM-III, 1980).…”
Section: Studien Vor Einführung Des Dsm-iiiunclassified
“…Research into biological predictors of ECT response has been reviewed by Scott (1989), who concluded that 'There are no physiological measures or tests which are superior to clinical criteria in the selection of depressed patients for whom ECT would be an effective treatment'. A number of clinical scales have been produced to help predict response to ECT (eg Hobson, 1953;Roberts, 1959;Hamilton, 1974); perhaps the most widely used is the Newcastle scale (Carney et al, 1965). More recently, two double-blind trials of ECT focused attention on the predictive role of delusions (Crow et al, 1984;Brandon et al, 1984), the former study finding delusions to be 'the most significant and only consistent predictor of response to real ECT'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%