1991
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19911101)68:9<2017::aid-cncr2820680929>3.0.co;2-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors in cystosarcoma phyllodes. A clinicopathologic study of 77 patients

Abstract: The authors studied prognostic factors in 77 patients with primary cystosarcoma phyllodes (CSP) of the breast. Median patient age was 50 years of age, and the median follow‐up time was 8 years. Sixteen patients (21%) had distant metastases and subsequently died of CSP. Clinical variables such as age, symptom duration, clinical tumor size, and type of surgery were not of prognostic value. Local recurrence was more common among patients treated with breast‐conserving surgery than among those treated with mastect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
127
1
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
127
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Histologic grade, [6][7][8] stromal overgrowth, 9,10 tumor necrosis and heterologous stromal elements, 11 as well as a combination of morphologic parameters, 12 have been traditionally used as predictors of clinical outcome. Nevertheless, specific parameters that can independently define recurrent likelihood are not universally agreed upon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Histologic grade, [6][7][8] stromal overgrowth, 9,10 tumor necrosis and heterologous stromal elements, 11 as well as a combination of morphologic parameters, 12 have been traditionally used as predictors of clinical outcome. Nevertheless, specific parameters that can independently define recurrent likelihood are not universally agreed upon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aetiology is unknown but risk factors like female gender, fourth and fifth decades of life, previous breast lesions have been reported [1]. It is a fairly large tumor which could be confused with giant fibroadenoma but massive sized phyllodes tumors like in our index case have been reported, also is bilateral occurence [1,7,8]. Our case involved the whole breast which was six times the size of the contralateral breast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…However, we were unable to link the protracted vomiting with the primary diagnosis in our patient initially because the abdomen is a rare site for metastasis and the patient did not show any sign of metastatic disease on the first presentation rather she showed progressive post-operative recovery up till the time of the initial discharge. Sometimes, distinguishing benign from malignant type is not always possible clinically [8] but the large size, nipple erosion and bleeding correlate positively with malignancy. Also, histopathology shows an unusual similarity among intra-canalicular fibroadenoma, benign phyllodes tumor and cystosarcoma and this could cause confusion even for the experienced pathologist [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations