2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors for unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking-plate fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
85
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, studies show that fractures treated with either anatomic reduction or screws in the inferomedial humeral head for which no medial column support was obtained had a high incidence of failure. 3,[9][10][11][12] An intramedullary fibular allograft used together with a locking plate fixation has been recently described in biomechanical studies to provide additional medial support and prevent varus malalignment. 13 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a locking plate with fibular allograft augmentation in unstable humeral fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, studies show that fractures treated with either anatomic reduction or screws in the inferomedial humeral head for which no medial column support was obtained had a high incidence of failure. 3,[9][10][11][12] An intramedullary fibular allograft used together with a locking plate fixation has been recently described in biomechanical studies to provide additional medial support and prevent varus malalignment. 13 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a locking plate with fibular allograft augmentation in unstable humeral fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 There is no general agreement on the optimal treatment for these fractures, and 1 of 9 patients treated with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or hemiarthroplasty requires revision surgery 21 because of often serious complications. 6,9,25,29,37,41,45 An acceptable solution should take the osteoporotic bone especially of the greater tuberosity into account and ensure a predictable and rapid postoperative recovery of the ability to perform daily activities, independent of patient compliance and capability of postoperative rehabilitation. The use of a reverse total shoulder replacement (reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [RTSA]) as proposed by Grammont et al 19 is an alternative that addresses the additional fragility of the rotator cuff and has shown promising results in a few case series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) Previous investigators described the importance of anatomic reduction and mechanical support of medial calcar in proximal humerus fractures, reporting high failure rate or varus malunion without medial column support in cases of concomitant comminuted fracture at the medial calcar. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Since Walch et al 13) used the intramedullary bone peg technique in treating nonunion at the humeral surgical neck, Gardner et al 14) used a fibular strut allograft as an endosteal implant and support for proximal humerus fractures in small series [14][15][16][17][18] The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of locking plate fixation with a fibular strut allograft for unstable osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures. We hypothesized that the use of fibular strut allograft as an internal pillar may be a good option for preventing varus collapse and maintaining the initial reduction status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%