2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors for tumor recurrence in patients with clinical stage I seminoma undergoing surveillance—A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the multivariate analysis of prognostic factors, vascular invasion did not reach a statistically significant, independent predictive value [12]. A recent systematic review showed that tumor size (better considered as a continuous variable) was positively associated with relapse rate in 10 of 14 studies, whereas RTI was only positively associated with relapse rate in 4 of 13 studies [13]. However, RTI status was not analyzed in at least 25–33% of patients in some of the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the multivariate analysis of prognostic factors, vascular invasion did not reach a statistically significant, independent predictive value [12]. A recent systematic review showed that tumor size (better considered as a continuous variable) was positively associated with relapse rate in 10 of 14 studies, whereas RTI was only positively associated with relapse rate in 4 of 13 studies [13]. However, RTI status was not analyzed in at least 25–33% of patients in some of the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the histopathological risk factors in the primary tumour employed to define high-risk group in CS I patients are not very well founded and do not constitute a good basis for decision on adjuvant treatment. Existing studies are often hampered by heterogeneous study populations,7 11–16 substantial amount of missing data,1 3 4 13 17 limited statistical power,13 18 19 lack of central pathology review1 3 7 13 17 19 and with potential variable reporting of the histopathological risk factors 20–24. Further, the prognostic power of the risk factors is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In seminoma, a clear correlation between increasing tumour size and risk of relapse has been reported 3 4 13 16 17. A cut-off value of 4 cm is the most frequently studied, but evidence to justify this cut-off is lacking 13 14. Even in a ‘high-risk setting’ (tumours 6 cm or larger) adjuvant radiotherapy led to overtreatment in two-thirds of the patients 25.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, its significance as a prognostic marker remains controversial. In a recently published systematic review, tumour size positively correlated with relapse in ten of the 14 included studies, whereas rete testis invasion was associated with tumour relapse in only four of the 12 included studies 6 . In a review by Boormans et al, there was no sufficient evidence for both factors 7 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%