2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00431-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic factors for medulloblastoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
41
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in a recent study, localized, non-metastatic disease (M0 Chang stage) was a positive predictor (n = 30) [1] while in other studies [5,6] including the present one, M0 stage was not a prognostic factor. The problems of defining prognostic factors in adult medulloblastoma is paralleled by inconclusive findings in pediatric series where higher age and low M-stage were frequently [15,17,29], but not consistently [19,20] prognostic factors. The value of factors such as lateral localization or desmoplastic histology is also unclear [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Also, in a recent study, localized, non-metastatic disease (M0 Chang stage) was a positive predictor (n = 30) [1] while in other studies [5,6] including the present one, M0 stage was not a prognostic factor. The problems of defining prognostic factors in adult medulloblastoma is paralleled by inconclusive findings in pediatric series where higher age and low M-stage were frequently [15,17,29], but not consistently [19,20] prognostic factors. The value of factors such as lateral localization or desmoplastic histology is also unclear [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Modern advances in treatment regimens have improved 5-year survival rates to ϳ70% for standard-risk patients (1-4), but survival rates for high-risk patients are as low as 25% (5,6). This clinical dichotomy, in which metastatic disease at presentation, age Ͻ3 years, or residual tumor Ͼ1.5 cm 2 on magnetic resonance imaging categorize patients as high-risk, is the only stratification of medulloblastoma patients currently undertaken for therapeutic purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, patients are divided into average and high-risk groups, with the high-risk group being characterized by three clinical parameters: age group (<3 years), residual tumor after resection >1.5 cm (3), and evidence of metastasis at presentation (3,4). Recent reports, however, indicate that these clinical variables are an inadequate method of defining disease risk (5). To further develop parameters for clinical outcome prediction, molecular genetic markers such as expression of trkC (6), c-myc (7), erbB (8), PDGFRB (9, 10) chromosomal abnormality iso-17q (11), a gain of 8q (12), or anaplastic histology (13) have also been suggested to be potential aids in predicting prognosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%