2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic cancer gene signatures share common regulatory motifs

Abstract: Scientists have discovered various prognostic gene signatures (GSs) in different cancer types. Surprisingly, although different GSs from the same cancer type can be used to measure similar biological characteristics, often rarely is there a gene shared by different GSs. To explain such a paradox, we hypothesized that GSs from the same cancer type may be regulated by common regulatory motifs. To test this hypothesis, we carried out a comprehensive motif analysis on the prognostic GSs from five cancer types. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(68 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, significant overlap was observed among regulators (i.e., miRNAs and TFs) in the networks. The low conservation of target genes in the prognostic co-regulatory network was concordant with previous studies finding that prognostic genes themselves lack cross-cancer conservation [24,25], which also led to the lack of cross-cancer conservation of FFLs that comprise prognostic genes. However, when we focused on miRNAs and TFs that regulate target genes, some miRNAs and TFs played roles in multiple prognostic co-regulatory networks.…”
Section: The Landscape Of Prognostic Mirna-tf Co-regulatory Networksupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, significant overlap was observed among regulators (i.e., miRNAs and TFs) in the networks. The low conservation of target genes in the prognostic co-regulatory network was concordant with previous studies finding that prognostic genes themselves lack cross-cancer conservation [24,25], which also led to the lack of cross-cancer conservation of FFLs that comprise prognostic genes. However, when we focused on miRNAs and TFs that regulate target genes, some miRNAs and TFs played roles in multiple prognostic co-regulatory networks.…”
Section: The Landscape Of Prognostic Mirna-tf Co-regulatory Networksupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Eight of the 236 genes were previously known in 17 cancers [1] ( Table S1). Very few genes were found to be shared across cancer types, which were consistent with the literatures [1,13]. It is notable that the subunits of P-and V-ATPases (such as ATP13A3, ATP1A3, and ATP6V1C2) were in the list.…”
Section: Mapping and Characterization Of Prognostic Genessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Identification of gene signatures is crucial in cancer genomics. Prognostic gene signatures within a cancer type constitute a set of genes whose expression changes reveal important information about tumor diagnosis, prognosis and even therapeutic response [9, 12]. The dependence on the use of heatmaps to apply published gene signatures for tumor subtyping is increasing and along with it, the challenges in obtaining results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%