2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00994-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic and predictive value of the newly proposed grading system of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma in Chinese patients: a retrospective multicohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This grading system classifies any tumor with ≥20% high‐grade patterns, including solid, micropapillary, and complex glandular patterns, as IASLC grade 3. Moreover, three further validation studies confirmed that this grading system provides significant prognostication 5–8 . However, IMA differs from invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA) because of major clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and genetic differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This grading system classifies any tumor with ≥20% high‐grade patterns, including solid, micropapillary, and complex glandular patterns, as IASLC grade 3. Moreover, three further validation studies confirmed that this grading system provides significant prognostication 5–8 . However, IMA differs from invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA) because of major clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and genetic differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, three further validation studies confirmed that this grading system provides significant prognostication. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 However, IMA differs from invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA) because of major clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and genetic differences. Therefore, IMA was excluded from this grading system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This grading system better predicts patients' outcomes compared to systems using mitotic counts or nuclear grade [36]. Several validation studies found that the IASLC grading system had prognostic significance in patients with LADC, with a well-stratified recurrence-free survival or OS [41][42][43][44]. Therefore, we used this grading system to evaluate the performance of our trained models by comparing the DSS curves derived by the pathologists and the CNNs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has consistently been found to correlate with prognosis and consists of: Grade 1: lepidic predominant tumor; Grade 2: acinar or papillary predominant tumor, both with no or less than 20% of high-grade patterns; and Grade 3: any tumor with 20% or more of high-grade patterns (solid, micropapillary and or complex gland). The established grading system is based on prognostic-related histological criteria and has utility and prognostic significance for IPA (Hou et al, 2022). Importantly, most lung cancer patients are initially diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease, often with a poor prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%