2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6530-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of SNHG6 in human cancers: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: Recently, accumulating evidence has suggested that the aberrant expression of SNHG6 exists in a variety of tumors and has a correlation with poor clinical outcomes across cancer patients. Considering the inconsistent data among published studies, we aim to assess the prognostic effect of SNHG6 on malignancies. Methods: We retrieved relevant publications in Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane Library based on predefined selection criteria, up to October 1, 2019. Pooled hazard ratios… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to recent studies, SNHG6 is overexpressed in cancer tissues compared with the corresponding noncancerous tissues as well as in different cancer cell lines [11][12][13]. Upregulated SNHG6 relates to advanced tumor progression and short survival in patients [14,15]. SNHG6 is responsible for cell proliferation, migration, invasion, reduced apoptosis in vitro, increased tumor size, and increased metastases in vivo [16,17].…”
Section: Snhg6-a Novel Player In Human Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to recent studies, SNHG6 is overexpressed in cancer tissues compared with the corresponding noncancerous tissues as well as in different cancer cell lines [11][12][13]. Upregulated SNHG6 relates to advanced tumor progression and short survival in patients [14,15]. SNHG6 is responsible for cell proliferation, migration, invasion, reduced apoptosis in vitro, increased tumor size, and increased metastases in vivo [16,17].…”
Section: Snhg6-a Novel Player In Human Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All enrolled studies were assessed by two independent investigators, and disagreements were resolved by reaching a consensus after discussion with the third author. Articles that met the following criteria were enrolled in our study: (1) original articles investigating the role of SNHG15 in cancers that were definitively diagnosed by histopathology; (2) samples were cancer tissue and adjacent normal tissue; (3) detection method was qRT-PCR; (4) clinical features, including age, gender, tumour size, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis, and prognostic indicators, such as overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or progression-free survival (PFS), were reported in the paper; (5) patients were categorised into increased and decreased SNHG15 expression groups based on a cut-off value, and the number of patients in these two groups was explicitly stated; (6) hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported by multivariate analysis from the articles or were available to be indirectly calculated via Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves; and (7) the language of the article was English.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, a growing body of work has demonstrated that aberrant expression of lncRNAs is correlated with biological processes, including tumour progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and invasion, indicating that lncRNAs can serve as tumour suppressors or oncogenes for cancer control [4,5]. Recently, small nucleolar RNA host gene 6 (SNHG6), linc00152, and opa-interacting protein 5 antisense RNA 1(OIP5-AS1) have been identified as potential prognostic biomarkers involved in the modulation of tumourrelated genes and specific molecular mechanisms in human cancers [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All enrolled studies were assessed by two independent investigators, and disagreements were resolved by reaching a consensus after discussion with the third author. Articles that met the following criteria were enrolled in our study: (1) original articles investigating the role of SNHG15 in cancers that were de nitively diagnosed by histopathology; (2) samples were cancer tissue and adjacent normal tissue; (3) detection method was qRT-PCR; (4) clinical features, including age, gender, tumour size, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis, and prognostic indicators, such as overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or progression-free survival (PFS), were reported in the paper; (5) patients were categorised into increased and decreased SNHG15 expression groups based on a cut-off value, and the number of patients in these two groups was explicitly stated; (6) hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% con dence intervals (CIs) were reported by multivariate analysis from the articles or were available to be indirectly calculated via Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves; and (7) the language of the article was English.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%