2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07269-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic analysis and nomogram establishment in patients with head and neck myoepithelial carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our nomogram incorporated the TNM staging system and other critical variables but exhibited higher accuracy and better discrimination for the training and validation cohorts. The C‐index and AUC values derived from our nomogram were >0.8 and were superior to those derived from traditional staging systems and most established models in head and neck carcinoma 50‐52 . Liu et al 51 established an OS‐specific nomogram for patients with adenosquamous carcinoma in the oral and maxillofacial region and reported a C‐index of 0.71.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our nomogram incorporated the TNM staging system and other critical variables but exhibited higher accuracy and better discrimination for the training and validation cohorts. The C‐index and AUC values derived from our nomogram were >0.8 and were superior to those derived from traditional staging systems and most established models in head and neck carcinoma 50‐52 . Liu et al 51 established an OS‐specific nomogram for patients with adenosquamous carcinoma in the oral and maxillofacial region and reported a C‐index of 0.71.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The C-index and AUC values derived from our nomogram were >0.8 and were superior to those derived from traditional staging systems and most established models in head and neck carcinoma. [50][51][52] Liu et al 51 established an OS-specific nomogram for patients with adenosquamous carcinoma in the oral and maxillofacial region and reported a C-index of 0.71. Similarly, a nomogram established for postoperative hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma showed C-index values of 0.705 to 0.723 (training group) and 0.681 to 0.736 (validation group).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%