2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosis in pathology: Are we “prognosticating” or only establishing correlations between independent variables and survival? A study with various analytics cautions about the overinterpretation of statistical results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in reporting and publishing standards, as well as an important publication overload in each of these fields, makes the accurate and timely inclusion of new evidence in a structured assessment to inform classification of a tumour difficult. [5][6][7] The WCT is an important route for the incorporation of non-commercial knowledge from diagnostic research into patient management, providing international standards and clinical guidance for pathologists and cancer researchers worldwide. Decisions for such a global reference tool need to be informed by the best available evidence, and the risk of incorporating misinformation into the clinical decision pathways has to be minimised.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in reporting and publishing standards, as well as an important publication overload in each of these fields, makes the accurate and timely inclusion of new evidence in a structured assessment to inform classification of a tumour difficult. [5][6][7] The WCT is an important route for the incorporation of non-commercial knowledge from diagnostic research into patient management, providing international standards and clinical guidance for pathologists and cancer researchers worldwide. Decisions for such a global reference tool need to be informed by the best available evidence, and the risk of incorporating misinformation into the clinical decision pathways has to be minimised.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model recognises the relevance of information from numerous fields when classifying tumours, and defines the challenge this represents for the editorial board. Differences in reporting and publishing standards, as well as an important publication overload in each of these fields, makes the accurate and timely inclusion of new evidence in a structured assessment to inform classification of a tumour difficult 5–7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%