1985
DOI: 10.1136/adc.60.5.479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosis for babies born with fused eyelids.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, signs from physical examination, such as fusion of the eyelids, were used to determine viability at extremely preterm gestations, although their utility has not been borne out. 34,35 The use of the combined 5 factors in the model was again found to outperform gestational age alone as a tool for predicting survival, 4 and the predictive benefits of a modelbased vs gestational age-based approach were demonstrated in the decision curve analysis. In the future, other methods, such as the use of biochemical markers of infant maturity, may enhance our ability to estimate infant outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Historically, signs from physical examination, such as fusion of the eyelids, were used to determine viability at extremely preterm gestations, although their utility has not been borne out. 34,35 The use of the combined 5 factors in the model was again found to outperform gestational age alone as a tool for predicting survival, 4 and the predictive benefits of a modelbased vs gestational age-based approach were demonstrated in the decision curve analysis. In the future, other methods, such as the use of biochemical markers of infant maturity, may enhance our ability to estimate infant outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The C statistic of the updated model was not substantially different from that observed when deriving the original model and in independent validations of that model and demonstrated the continued difficulty of estimating outcomes for extremely preterm infants at the time of birth. Historically, signs from physical examination, such as fusion of the eyelids, were used to determine viability at extremely preterm gestations, although their utility has not been borne out . The use of the combined 5 factors in the model was again found to outperform gestational age alone as a tool for predicting survival, and the predictive benefits of a model-based vs gestational age–based approach were demonstrated in the decision curve analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the current literature provides scant data in this regard. The few studies that have been reported either have not subjected the data to any statistical analysis 35 - 6 or have treated the data with the standard univariate chi-square analysis. 7 In this latter study, eyelid status and 1-minute Apgar scores were jointly analyzed to determine the combined effect on neonatal survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%