2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2007.00211.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosis for Abutment Teeth of Removable Dentures: A Retrospective Study

Abstract: Removable partial dentures retained by conical crowns have a favorable clinical prognosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly Table 3 Odds ratios for partial and total facing loss of double crowns after 6 years according to study group and several patient and tooth characteristics C-RDP cast double crown-retained removable dental prosthesis, EP-RDP electroplated double crown-retained removable dental prosthesis, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, p probability value from the multiple Cox regression model all of the factors used to interpret the survival of RDP apply to the abutment teeth also. Previous long-term studies [4,8,9,14] and the results of this study showed that abutment tooth loss was not correlated with the type of abutment; the most common reasons for tooth loss were biological complications, for example periodontal disease, caries, and tooth fracture. The lower cumulative survival of abutment teeth in the EP-RDP group (85 %) than in the C-RDP group (91 %)-without reaching statistical significance-may be correlated with the larger number of males in the EP-RDP group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nearly Table 3 Odds ratios for partial and total facing loss of double crowns after 6 years according to study group and several patient and tooth characteristics C-RDP cast double crown-retained removable dental prosthesis, EP-RDP electroplated double crown-retained removable dental prosthesis, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, p probability value from the multiple Cox regression model all of the factors used to interpret the survival of RDP apply to the abutment teeth also. Previous long-term studies [4,8,9,14] and the results of this study showed that abutment tooth loss was not correlated with the type of abutment; the most common reasons for tooth loss were biological complications, for example periodontal disease, caries, and tooth fracture. The lower cumulative survival of abutment teeth in the EP-RDP group (85 %) than in the C-RDP group (91 %)-without reaching statistical significance-may be correlated with the larger number of males in the EP-RDP group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Numerous reports are available on the survival of RDP, survival of abutment teeth, and complications of cast double crown-retained RDP [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The current dental literature, however, does not provide sufficient information about the clinical performance of RDP retained by electroplated double crown systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some complications of the clasp, such as clasp-arm breakage, ill fit, decrease of retention, and abutment tooth disease, are frequently observed with long-term use of the RPD [1,2]. If the crown used as the abutment tooth is removed or eliminated because of secondary caries or occurrence of periapical periodontitis, the RPD will be repaired or remade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For decades, double crown retained removable dentures have been an approved method for clinical treatment of reduced residual dentition, combining the advantages of fixed with those of removable partial dentures [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Apart from enabling optimal hygiene, double crown retained removable dentures achieve a favorable axial load and suitable fitting of the abutment teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%