2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00187-010-0110-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosemärkte

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, we also expect a stronger focus on combining the scenario technique with methods which aim to identify the single most probable future. Apart from the Delphi method ( Höhne and Tiberius, 2020 , Tseng et al, 2009 , Tiberius and Hirth, 2019 ), also prediction markets ( Arrow et al, 2008 , Tiberius and Rasche, 2011 ), crowdsourcing ( Flostrand, 2017 ), and superforecasting ( Schoemaker & Tetlock, 2016 ) could increase in relevance in this regard. As these techniques show high forecast accuracies, they can provide a focal scenario, which can be surrounded by alternate scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we also expect a stronger focus on combining the scenario technique with methods which aim to identify the single most probable future. Apart from the Delphi method ( Höhne and Tiberius, 2020 , Tseng et al, 2009 , Tiberius and Hirth, 2019 ), also prediction markets ( Arrow et al, 2008 , Tiberius and Rasche, 2011 ), crowdsourcing ( Flostrand, 2017 ), and superforecasting ( Schoemaker & Tetlock, 2016 ) could increase in relevance in this regard. As these techniques show high forecast accuracies, they can provide a focal scenario, which can be surrounded by alternate scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delphi studies are a systematic method that, with the help of expert opinions, generates the most likely future scenario. Future research could also use other methods such as prediction markets [ 151 , 152 ]. Additionally, Delphi scenario only describes a probable future but does not theoretically explain how it emerges [ 153 , 154 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of using a Delphi technique, the application of other group-based forecasting methods could have been possible. For example, we chose not to use a prediction market – which simulates “stock” exchanges on which future statements are traded to find their probability of occurrence as the “stock” price (Arrow et al , 2008; Tiberius and Rasche, 2011) – because the determination of the valid equilibrium price for each projection requires the heavy trading of a large number of participants, the forecast accuracy is quite low and the participants are somewhat unsatisfied with the process (Graefe and Armstrong, 2011). As another alternative, we chose not to use crowdsourcing as a forecasting method because it is based only on many layperson opinions (Flostrand, 2017), which we did not find appropriate for assessing the specific projections (Graefe and Armstrong, 2011; Rowe and Wright, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%