2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icasi.2017.7988376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ProgEdu - an automatic assessment platform for programming courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend echoes findings from other studies indicating improvement in student programming skills (Chen et al, 2017;Helmick, 2007;Higgins, Gray, Symeonidis, & Tsintsifas, 2005). However, our analysis makes an important contribution to the literature by suggesting that the more students used the tool (PU2), the more they felt it reduced their workload (PEO3) and saved them time (PEO4), especially the latter.…”
Section: Analysis For the Rqsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This trend echoes findings from other studies indicating improvement in student programming skills (Chen et al, 2017;Helmick, 2007;Higgins, Gray, Symeonidis, & Tsintsifas, 2005). However, our analysis makes an important contribution to the literature by suggesting that the more students used the tool (PU2), the more they felt it reduced their workload (PEO3) and saved them time (PEO4), especially the latter.…”
Section: Analysis For the Rqsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, Git is not a fully automated tool, since there are several tasks that teachers and students have to perform manually. An extension of Git has been provided by Chen, Chen, Hsueh, Lee, and Li (2017), which offers more automation, but their tool has not been tested in real long-term educational settings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that, for most students (<65%), the feedback they receive with each execution has served to improve their learning. This finding is consistent with previous research that revealed a positive impact on student learning with the introduction of an automated assessment tool into a programming course (Chen et al ., ; Kelleher, ; Pettit et al ., ). Unique to this study was the differentiation of our analysis between three fundamental aspects that influence learning improvement: write better distributed algorithm program codes, learn the required concepts better and more easily, and get a better mark.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Git is not a fully automated tool, since there are several tasks that teachers and students have to perform manually. An extension of Git (a platform, called ProgEdu), provided by Chen, Chen, Hsueh, Lee, and Li (), enables automatic assessment of assignments in programming courses; however, their tool has not been tested in real long‐term educational settings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found out that AATs can be useful in reinforcing the accuracy of assessment, assisting teachers and enhancing student learning. Nevertheless, though several ATTs have been developed, only few studies were dedicated to producing formal results regarding the effects of tool use (Chen et al, 2017;Ihantola et al, 2010;Kelleher, 2014). In order to decrease negative student perceptions, the authors emphasize the importance for more systematic experimental research that takes the students' opinions into account for determining the necessary factors and features to improve AATs' design and use.…”
Section: Literature Review: Self-regulated Learning (Srl) Strategy Use In Online Computer Science Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%