1993
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100124120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profound deafness treated by the Ineraid multichannel intracochlear implant

Abstract: AbstarctTwelve deaf adults and two deaf children were treated with the Ineraid (formerly Symbion) four channel intracochlear implant between September 1989 and October 1991 at Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge. All were post-lingually totally deaf and had found themselves beyond the reach of hearing aids. The effect of the implant upon the patients ability to lip-read was tested with the speech tracking test, BKB sentences (comparable to CID sentences) and Boothroyd word lists (comparable to NU6 word lists).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature contains descriptions of how, in exceptional cases, the existing electrode array is held in place within the cochlea by encircling it with a “wall” of scar tissue or bone [59]. The difficulty in such instances is that further attempts to extract the array can only partially remove it, with a residual portion remaining within the cochlea [60]. This calls for an intraoperative decision as to whether only one electrode – albeit incomplete and basally positioned – can be inserted or whether a double array can be introduced into the cochlea by means of two cochleostomies.…”
Section: Clinical Application Of Biomaterials Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature contains descriptions of how, in exceptional cases, the existing electrode array is held in place within the cochlea by encircling it with a “wall” of scar tissue or bone [59]. The difficulty in such instances is that further attempts to extract the array can only partially remove it, with a residual portion remaining within the cochlea [60]. This calls for an intraoperative decision as to whether only one electrode – albeit incomplete and basally positioned – can be inserted or whether a double array can be introduced into the cochlea by means of two cochleostomies.…”
Section: Clinical Application Of Biomaterials Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…knöcherne Ummauerung des alten Elektrodenträgers beschrieben[72]. Die Schwierigkeit in diesen Fällen besteht darin, dass bei weiteren Extraktionsversuchen der Elektrodenträger nur teilweise entfernt werden kann und ein Rest der Elektrode in der Cochlea verbleibt[73]. Hier muss dann intraoperativ entschieden werden, ob lediglich eine inkomplett, basal platzierte Elektrode bzw.…”
unclassified