Profitability, risk and cash flow deficit for beginning cow–calf producers

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to estimate the amount of cash flow deficit, if any, needed to maintain the operating costs and service debt of a startup cow–calf enterprise. The study compares long-term profitability and risk between starting small and building a herd to full carrying capacity or by starting at desired herd capacity.Design/methodology/approachA dynamic cattle growth model was developed to capture expanding and maintaining the desired herd size. Discounted cash flow (DCF) models over a 15-year period were calculated to estimate net present value (NPV), modified internal rate of return (MIRR) and cash flow deficit to keep the business operating and service debt. Simulation analyses were conducted considering price and production risk.FindingsStarting at the desired herd size was preferred, according to NPV/MIRR and cash flow deficit, but the differences were not substantial. Assuming the operation is liquidated at book values, there was a 36.3% probability of this enterprise having a zero or positive NPV. If the conservative terminal value assumption is relaxed up to feasible market values, the cow–calf enterprise is economically attractive at an estimated 2.4% opportunity cost of capital. However, the producer would experience a cash flow deficit during the first seven years, which was simulated to be $14,892 and $15,985 annual for both strategies.Originality/valueInnovative methods used in this study include varying the annual opportunity cost of capital as a function of financing decisions, stochastic prices by cattle type and stochastic weaning weights that are a function of a dynamic cattle model.

Simulation Approaches Used for Management and Decision Making in the Beef Production Sector: A Systematic Review

“…Most studies [ 24 , 26 , 40 , 97 ] that focus on increasing farm productivity include herd size and number of animals as an important indicator of productivity. Similarly, various studies [ 68 , 76 , 98 ] also make economic predictions based on herd structure. Therefore, the size and structure of the herd can be considered an important component in determining the productivity and economic returns of the farm.…”

A Techno-Economic Analysis Comparing a Hammermill and a Rotary Shear System to Process Woody Biomass for Biofuel Production

“…A positive NPV RS-HM would represent expected savings using the RS instead of the HM and vice versa. This total economic saving value is also expressed in terms of anticipated annual savings per depot by calculating the NPV RS-HM 's equivalent value of an ordinary annuity [16,18], which represents equal savings over the 20 productive years, using:…”