Profitability Paradox: Evidence from Commercial Banks in Pakistan

Abstract

It is generally believed that information technology (IT) impacts the organizational profitability positively however empirical evidence has remained inconclusive. This was first highlighted by Solow (1987), labelled as Solow’s paradox, and later labelled as profitability paradox by Beccalli (2007). The persistence of inconclusive empirical literature provides the impetus of this research to investigate the impact of different components of IT on banks profitability in Pakistan from 2009-2016 for a sample of 25 Pakistani commercial banks. Return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE) have been used as indicators of bank profitability whereas two different components of IT, number of ATMs and investment in banks software have been employed as proxies of IT. Empirical results reveal that investment in bank software appears to have a positive influence on bank profitability, while the acquisition of ATMs seems to reduce the profitability of banks. It can be concluded that IT paradox is not necessarily a paradox of IT in totality and may be termed as IT component paradox.

Capital Structure's Role in Shaping Stock Return Dynamics

“…Interestingly, our findings diverge from prior studies conducted by (Ernawati & Budiharjo, 2020;Mulyani, 2014), both of which identified a positive and substantial link between return on assets and capital structure. However, our conclusions align with Shahid et al (2016), who documented a negligible and negative impact of ROA on capital structure.…”

“…This holds significance as a company's capital structure encompasses longand short-term debt, making fluctuations in the solvency ratio consequential for the overall structure. This discovery resonates with Shahid et al (2016) findings, demonstrating a significant interplay between leverage and capital structure. The solvency ratio is vital for businesses in devising capital structure strategies to achieve optimal arrangements.…”

“…Furthermore, Andarsari et al (2016) posit that liquidity negatively affects capital structure, consistent with the research conducted by Ghasemi & Ab Razak (2016), which states that liquidity impacts capital structure. Shahid et al (2016) examined Pakistani commercial banks and found that profitability has a significant relationship with and an impact on capital structure. Velnampy & Niresh (2014), also support a positive effect of profitability on capital structure.…”

An empirical investigation of Islamic marketing ethics and convergence marketing as key factors in the improvement of Islamic banks performance

“…Convergence marketing is concerned with providing banking services to customers who are familiar with and involved in the digital world. Even so, information technology can be a paradox that makes investing in information technology detrimental to the company (Hamid et al, 2018). Convergence marketing needs to first turn the investment in information technology into a competitive advantage to lead to performance.…”

“…Research on 42 branchless banks in Kenya found that investment in information technology reduced bank financial performance significantly (Dzombo et al , 2017). Likewise, research in Pakistan reveals the existence of an information technology paradox, namely, when certain components of information technology harm banking performance (Hamid et al , 2018). In line with this, a study in Lebanon found that investment in internet banking had no significant effect on the bank performance (Mahboub, 2018).…”