2002
DOI: 10.1080/13657300209380301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profitability comparison of the partitioned aquaculture system with traditional catfish farms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard financial performance of aquaculture fisheries production was used (Adams et al, 2001;Brown et al, 2002;Goode et al, 2002;Fong et al, 2005;Liu & Sumaila, 2007;Sathiadhas & Najmudeen, 2004). Data was collected for both inshore and offshore production, income and cost were calculated annually, and then the net present value (NPV) was calculated for a ten year production period.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard financial performance of aquaculture fisheries production was used (Adams et al, 2001;Brown et al, 2002;Goode et al, 2002;Fong et al, 2005;Liu & Sumaila, 2007;Sathiadhas & Najmudeen, 2004). Data was collected for both inshore and offshore production, income and cost were calculated annually, and then the net present value (NPV) was calculated for a ten year production period.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aerators, generators) used in catfish farming. Goode et al. (2002) estimated investment costs for three sizes of the partitioned aquaculture system (PAS) and compared these with cost estimates of three traditional catfish farms by Engle and Kouka (1996).…”
Section: Investment Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aerators, generators) used in catfish farming. Goode et al (2002) estimated investment costs for three sizes of the partitioned aquaculture system (PAS) and compared these with cost estimates of three traditional catfish farms by Engle and Kouka (1996). Goode et al (2002) reported that investment costs for the PAS were 42-44% greater than for comparable sizes of traditional catfish farms.…”
Section: Investment Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La revisión de la literatura científica sobre piscicultura ha permitido identificar un importante número de trabajos que utilizan la rentabilidad de la actividad como indicador del efecto económico del factor analizado, entre los que cabe destacar los que la utilizan para analizar: el rendimiento económico de diferentes tipos de alimentación (Urban Jr. y Pruder, 1991;Moñino et al, 2002;Sánchez Lozano et al, 2007;Petersen et al, 2011), la viabilidad económica de la explotación comercial de una especie o producto (Oca et al, 2002;Jeffs y Hooker, 2000;Keys et al, 2004;PootLópez y Gasca-Leyva, 2009;Shamshak y Anderson, 2009;García y García, 2010;Zúñiga, 2010), y el impacto que tienen las condiciones ambientales (Hatch et al, 1998;León et al, 2006;Hernández et al, 2007), el sistema de producción (Losordo y Westerman, 1994;Thongrak et al, 1997;Goode et al, 2002;Lever et al, 2004;Taylor et al, 2006;Liu;Sumaila, 2007y Buck et al, 2010 o la localización de la explotación (Moksness et al, 1998;Gasca-Leyva et al, 2002;Irz y McKenzie, 2003;Bozoglu y Ceyhan, 2009;Miao et al, 2009;Petersen y Phuong, 2010;Huang et al, 2011) sobre el resultado económico del proceso de cultivo.…”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified