Profitability and occupational injuries in U.S. underground coal mines

Abstract

Background-Coal plays a crucial role in the U.S. economy yet underground coal mining continues to be one of the most dangerous occupations in the country. In addition, there are large variations in both profitability and the incidence of occupational injuries across mines.Objective-The objective of this study was to examine the association between profitability and the incidence rate of occupational injuries in U.S. underground coal mines between 1992 and 2008.Data and method-We used mine-specific data on annual hours worked, geographic location, and the number of occupational injuries suffered annually from the employment and accident/ injury databases of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, and mine-specific data on annual revenue from coal sales, mine age, workforce union status, and mining method from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. A total of 5669 mine-year observations (number of mines × number of years) were included in our analysis. We used a negative binomial random effects model that was appropriate for analyzing panel (combined time-series and cross-sectional) injury data that were non-negative and discrete. The dependent variable, occupational injury, was measured in three different and non-mutually exclusive ways: all reported fatal and nonfatal injuries, reported nonfatal injuries with lost workdays, and the 'most serious' (i.e. sum of fatal and serious nonfatal) injuries reported. The total number of hours worked in each mine and year examined was used as an exposure variable. Profitability, the main explanatory variable, was approximated by revenue per hour worked. Our model included mine age, workforce union status, mining method, and geographic location as additional control variables.Results-After controlling for other variables, a 10% increase in real total revenue per hour worked was associated with 0.9%, 1.1%, and 1.6% decrease, respectively, in the incidence rates of all reported injuries, reported injuries with lost workdays, and the most serious injuries reported.Conclusion-We found an inverse relationship between profitability and each of the three indicators of occupational injuries we used. These results might be partially due to factors that

A New Look at the Longitudinal Relationship Between Motor Carrier Financial Performance and Safety

“…Our theory is not only consistent with anecdotal evidence from the motor carrier industry as detailed by Adams (), Belzer (), and Ouellet (), it is also consistent with findings from other industries such as coal mining (Asfaw et al. ). For example, Wu and Pagell () find that even at companies considered exemplars on social and environmental sustainability, the fear of falling short on financial performance metrics results in managers making short‐term decisions designed to improve financial to the detriment of social and environmental performance.…”

“…As explained by Asfaw et al. () and Madsen (), safety investments fall within this category of decisions, and thus managers must be cognizant not to let safety performance entropy. Moreover, in light of carrier selection decisions being driven primarily by reliability versus cost (Murphy et al.…”

Reconciling Alternative Theories for the Safety of Owner–Operators

“…We argue the evidence favors the prediction that owner–operators receive greater benefits from unsafe operation because economic strains result in myopic decisions that favor actions that alleviate those strains at the cost of safety (Vaughan ; Asfaw et al. ). Third, we draw on theory regarding how classes of safety behaviors differ regarding how their violation can alleviate financial strain (Miller and Saldanha ) to develop the most precise predictions to date for how carriers’ owner—operator use affects carrier‐level safety.…”

SWOT analysis of safety and environmental regulation for China and USA: its effect and influence on sustainable development of the coal industry

“…This fact then has seen many companies (coal industry inclusive) ignoring environmental and safety investments in their operations as they are considered additional costs aimed at reducing profits. However, much as heavy investment into safer and cleaner environment (which are dubbed ''undesirable outputs'') is considered not necessary for profits sake, studies have shown that when safety measures have been compromised and accidents have occurred, more loses are realized due to workers' compensation payment and production disruptions due to injuries and/or deaths (Moore et al 2010;Yakovlev and Sobel 2010;Asfaw et al 2013). Likewise, deterioration of the environment can be costly to the production process itself and the local environment (Si et al 2010).…”