2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2006.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profit-maximizing seeding rates and replanting thresholds for soybean: Maturity group interactions in the Mid-South

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Soybean production in the Mid‐South has historically relied on full‐season Maturity Group (MG) V and VI cultivars given the day‐length conditions in the region (Popp et al, 2006). However, the pod‐fill period of these MGs inconveniently coincides with the mid‐June through late‐August drought that is common in the region, subsequently limiting yield potential (Heatherly and Hodges, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soybean production in the Mid‐South has historically relied on full‐season Maturity Group (MG) V and VI cultivars given the day‐length conditions in the region (Popp et al, 2006). However, the pod‐fill period of these MGs inconveniently coincides with the mid‐June through late‐August drought that is common in the region, subsequently limiting yield potential (Heatherly and Hodges, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edwards and Purcell (2005) found that MG VI through MG II cultivars had similar yield potential in the Mississippi Delta region, but earlier maturing cultivars generally required higher plant population density (PPD) to achieve these yields. Subsequent analysis found that an economically optimal plant population density (EOPPD) ranging from 110,000 plants ha −1 for MG IV to 490,000 plants ha −1 for MG II generated similar net returns ranging from US$529 ha −1 for MG IV to US$502 ha −1 for MG III (Popp et al, 2006). The choice among MG and PPD depended on yield potential, seasonal oilseed prices, supplemental irrigation, and seed cost (Popp et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigated MG I and II cultivars in 19‐cm rows may achieve yields similar to traditional full‐season cultivars (Edwards and Purcell, 2005), but excessively high population densities are required to attain high yields. The savings in irrigation and labor for MG I and II cultivars usually does not offset the cost of increasing seeding rates (Popp et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigated MG I and II cultivars in 19-cm rows may achieve yields similar to traditional full-season cultivars , but excessively high population densities are required to attain high yields. The savings in irrigation and labor for MG I and II cultivars usually does not off set the cost of increasing seeding rates (Popp et al, 2006). found that for MG 00 to VI cultivars, yield responded to cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) in a curvilinear fashion and became asymptotic at high values of CIPAR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenological variability is classiÞed using an index of maturity group (MG), where MG 0 represents an early maturing cultivar adapted to northern regions with longer days and a short summer, and MG 8 represents late maturing cultivars adapted to southern regions with shorter days and a long summer. Farmers select a cultivar from a maturity group based on expected yield, date of planting, drought stress, and late season frost (Popp et al 2006). Within a given region, a range of maturity groups is adapted to local growing conditions, e.g., in central Indiana maturity groups with a ranking between 2.5 and 4.0 are suitable for cultivation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%