2015
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profilometry: A new statistical framework for the characterization of white matter pathways, with application to multiple sclerosis

Abstract: While progress has been made in both tract-profiling and metrics for white matter characterization, no single framework for a joint analysis of multimodality tract profiles accounting for age and gender is known to exist. The profilometry analysis and visualization appears to be a promising method to compare groups using a single score from MANCOVA while assessing the contribution of each metric with LDA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…52 In its simplest and most widely used form, tractography-defined ROI analysis, metrics are averaged across all voxels covered by a specific tract, [53][54][55][56][57] but more advanced techniques such as profilometry study metrics as a function of arc length along tract-specific exemplar tracks. [58][59][60] 4 | FIBER-TRACKING ALGORITHMS Since its introduction in 1998, 61,62 a multitude of papers introducing new tracking algorithms have been published. It is beyond the scope of this paper to review every published technique.…”
Section: Virtual Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 In its simplest and most widely used form, tractography-defined ROI analysis, metrics are averaged across all voxels covered by a specific tract, [53][54][55][56][57] but more advanced techniques such as profilometry study metrics as a function of arc length along tract-specific exemplar tracks. [58][59][60] 4 | FIBER-TRACKING ALGORITHMS Since its introduction in 1998, 61,62 a multitude of papers introducing new tracking algorithms have been published. It is beyond the scope of this paper to review every published technique.…”
Section: Virtual Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common to report asymmetry or group difference in bundle volume (Catani et al, 2007;Chenot et al, 2019;Song et al, 2014), diffusion values within the bundle of interest (average fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, etc.) (De Erausquin & Alba-Ferrara, 2013;Kimura-Ohba et al, 2016;Ling et al, 2012;Mole et al, 2016) or values along the bundle (called profilometry and tractometry) (Cousineau et al, 2017;Dayan et al, 2016;Yeatman, Dougherty, Myall, Wandell, & Feldman, 2012;Yeatman, Richie-Halford, Smith, Keshavan, & Rokem, 2018). Spatial distribution of cortical terminations of streamlines can help to identify cortical regions with underlying WM connections affected by a condition (Behrens et al, 2003;Donahue et al, 2016;Johansen-Berg et al, 2004;Mars et al, 2011;Rushworth, Behrens, & Johansen-Berg, 2005).…”
Section: Bundle Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both frameworks have the advantage of providing higher sensitivity to microstructural features of fibre pathways by mapping a set of MR-derived measures over white matter bundles. Recently, along-tract profiling has been successfully applied to study normal brain development (Geeraert et al, 2018) and to characterise areas of the brain with 40 abnormal properties in various brain conditions (Dayan et al, 2016;Cousineau et al, 2017;Groeschel et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%