2020
DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcaa035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiling of ribose methylations in ribosomal RNA from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients for evaluation of ribosomes as drug targets

Abstract: Cancer cells are addicted to ribosome biogenesis and high levels of translation. Thus, differential inhibition of cancer cells can be achieved by targeting aspects of ribosome biogenesis or ribosome function. Using RiboMeth-seq for profiling of the ∼112 2′-O-Me sites in human ribosomal RNA, we demonstrated pronounced hypomethylation at several sites in patient-derived diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines with a more severe perturbation in ABC-DLBCL compared to GBC-DLBCL. We extended our analysis to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(80 reference statements)
9
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this latter hypothesis, variations in rRNA 2 Ome can be interpreted as a biological noise. However, the observed increase in the rRNA 2 Ome level in some DLCBL and AML1-ETO-driven AML patients, and the correlation between SNORD expression and rRNA 2 Ome levels suggests that the variation of rRNA 2 Ome, at least at some sites, is cancer-specific or even tumor-specific [32,52,70]. In addition to being specific in regard to the nature of the tumor, rRNA 2 Ome levels are also different at some particular sites when comparing three distinct normal human organs (i.e., brain, liver, and skeletal muscle), supporting the tissue-specificity of rRNA 2 Ome [70].…”
Section: Diversity Of Rrna 2 Ome Profiles In Human Cancer Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on this latter hypothesis, variations in rRNA 2 Ome can be interpreted as a biological noise. However, the observed increase in the rRNA 2 Ome level in some DLCBL and AML1-ETO-driven AML patients, and the correlation between SNORD expression and rRNA 2 Ome levels suggests that the variation of rRNA 2 Ome, at least at some sites, is cancer-specific or even tumor-specific [32,52,70]. In addition to being specific in regard to the nature of the tumor, rRNA 2 Ome levels are also different at some particular sites when comparing three distinct normal human organs (i.e., brain, liver, and skeletal muscle), supporting the tissue-specificity of rRNA 2 Ome [70].…”
Section: Diversity Of Rrna 2 Ome Profiles In Human Cancer Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the decrease in SNORD expression may be responsible for the decreased rRNA 2 Ome levels, especially for the three sites with the most important variation, as observed in AML1-ETOdependent AML [55]. Second, the global decrease in rRNA 2 Ome could be caused by a passive effect driven by the hyperproliferation of cells, as the significant decrease in 2 Ome correlates with an increase in the proliferative Ki67 labelling index [70]. Indeed, rRNA synthesis is hyperactivated in cancer cells to maintain a high level of protein synthesis, essential for sustaining an hyperproliferative rate [72].…”
Section: Diversity Of Rrna 2 Ome Profiles In Human Cancer Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A first line of evidence supporting the hypothesis that tRNA and rRNA modifications are not static comes from the observation that these chemical decorations vary in human diseases including cancer [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. For example, two recent studies revealed a global reduction of rRNA 2ʹ-O-methylation at some rRNA sites (named variable sites) in two types of human tumours compared to their corresponding level in normal tissue [21,22]. These new cancerrelated hypomethylated patterns were found to be tumourspecific and associated with tumour aggressiveness [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the global level of tRNA modifications is generally higher in cancer cells compared to their corresponding level in normal tissue [23]. Based on these variations, both rRNA and tRNA modifications are now proposed as useful prognostic markers for cancer [14,21,22,24,25]. More generally, eukaryote tRNA modification levels have been shown to vary during cell cycle and in response to environmental stresses [5,[26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%