2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.09.21.508955
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiling Dynamic Patterns of Single-cell Motility

Abstract: Cell motility is essential to many biological processes as cells navigate and interact within their local microenvironments. Currently, most methods to quantify cell motility rely on the ability to follow and track individual cells. However, results from these approaches are typically reported as averaged values across cell populations. While these approaches offer biological simplicity, it limits the ability to assess cellular heterogeneity and infer generalizable patterns of single-cell behaviors at baseline… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal number of clusters were determined using the ‘elbow method’, or the beginning of the elbow of the inertia/silhouette graph shown in Supplementary Figure S19. Cluster partitioning was determined by the k-means algorithm, an unsupervised approach that only requires the number of clusters to be input by the user [62, 63]. Approximately 470,000 cells encompassing all experimental conditions were used to capture the entirety of possible morphological phenotypes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal number of clusters were determined using the ‘elbow method’, or the beginning of the elbow of the inertia/silhouette graph shown in Supplementary Figure S19. Cluster partitioning was determined by the k-means algorithm, an unsupervised approach that only requires the number of clusters to be input by the user [62, 63]. Approximately 470,000 cells encompassing all experimental conditions were used to capture the entirety of possible morphological phenotypes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in fast, gentle, large field-of-view microscopy, combined with new methods for image segmentation ( Lee et al, 2022 ; Pachitariu and Stringer, 2022 ; Stirling et al, 2021 ; Stringer et al, 2021 ; Tsai et al, 2019 ; Weigert et al, 2020 ) and cell tracking ( Bove et al, 2017 ; Cuny et al, 2022 ; Ershov et al, 2022 ; Ulicna et al, 2021 ), have enabled the analysis of thousands of cells over time and brought microscopy imaging into the realm of big data. Existing tools highlight the importance of morpho-kinetic analysis and phenomics, allowing separation of cell behaviours, but often require intermediate coding knowledge to use and generate latent space behaviour categories without de-abstractification ( Crainiciuc et al, 2022 ; Freckmann et al, 2022 ; Kimmel et al, 2021 , 2018 ; Liu et al, 2023 ; Maity et al, 2022 preprint; Molina-Moreno et al, 2022 ; Wiggins et al, 2023 ). We sought to develop a tool to measure and classify cell populations downstream of such methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenomic data can be used to distinguish macrophages from DCs and activated from non-activated neutrophils (33) by using tSNE for visualization and extracting example cells for visualization of characteristics (ACME) (34). Other methods address the need to link single cell visualizations and analysis to large datasets while analyzing diverse populations together (CAMI) (35) or use intracellular information to extract more parameters than segmentation alone (Pixie) (36). Others allow for the separation of cell subsets from heterogeneous populations (Tra-ject3D (37) and CellPhe (38)) but require an intermediate level of coding knowledge to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%