1998
DOI: 10.2974/kmj.48.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles of the Affinity of Antipsychotic Drugs for Neurotransmitter Receptors and Their Clinical Implication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Affinities for the dopaminergic receptors are also provided. (Kuoppamäki et al, 1995;Yonemura et al, 1998;Glennon, 2003;Kusumi et al, 2015). similar (≈10 nM).…”
Section: -Ht 7 Antagonists and Hiccupsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Affinities for the dopaminergic receptors are also provided. (Kuoppamäki et al, 1995;Yonemura et al, 1998;Glennon, 2003;Kusumi et al, 2015). similar (≈10 nM).…”
Section: -Ht 7 Antagonists and Hiccupsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Chlorpromazine (Ki ≈ 840 nM), for all practical purposes, has no effect at the 5-HT 1A receptor (Yonemura et al, 1998).…”
Section: Anxiolytic Azapironesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, higher pKi values correspond to lower Ki values, and vice versa. 1 However, we suppose that sometimes a mix-up can occur between different measures of receptor-binding affinity. For instance, in a review 2 published in 2010, Ki values for asenapine are reported as follows: D2 (8.9), 5-HT1A (8.6), 5-HT2A (10.15), 5-HT2C (10.46), α1 (8.9), H1 (9.0), M1 (5.09), while in a previous paper 3 the same numerical values described in the review mentioned above are presented as pKi, not Ki: D2 (8.9), 5-HT1A (8.6), 5-HT2A (10.2), 5-HT2C (10.5), α1 (8.9), H1 (9.0), M1 (5.09).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proper knowledge of binding affinity profiles is decisive to: predicting the specific efficacy of a drug on positive (e.g., antagonism and low Ki to D2), negative (e.g., high 5-HT2A/D2 ratio), and cognitive (e.g., antagonism and low Ki to 5-HT7) symptoms of schizophrenia; considering a dimensional pharmacotherapeutic approach, rather than a strictly categorical one; detecting specific propensity to trigger extrapyramidal symptoms, hyperprolactinemia, sexual dysfunctions, sedative/metabolic, and antiadrenergic/anticholinergic/antihistaminergic effects; defining the best switching strategies between different antipsychotics, choosing among abrupt switch, taper switch, cross-taper switch, or plateau-cross-taper switch; predicting dopaminergic/adrenergic/cholinergic/serotonin/histamine rebound; determining the potential pharmacodynamic synergy of antipsychotic polypharmacy to choose a suitable complementary affinity profile; applying results of preclinical pharmacology studies to humans; using pharmacoepidemiologic-pharmacodynamic methods to investigate the mechanisms of adverse drug reactions recorded in pharmacovigilance databases; understanding the pharmacodynamic factors involved in pharmacogenomic-directed therapeutics; and orientating clinicians toward precision medicine. 1 - 5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%