Profiles of second- to fourth-order moments of turbulent temperature fluctuations in the convective boundary layer: first measurements with rotational Raman lidar

Abstract

Abstract. The rotational Raman lidar (RRL) of the University of Hohenheim (UHOH) measures atmospheric temperature profiles with high resolution (10 s, 109 m). The data contain low-noise errors even in daytime due to the use of strong UV laser light (355 nm, 10 W, 50 Hz) and a very efficient interference-filter-based polychromator. In this paper, the first profiling of the second-to fourth-order moments of turbulent temperature fluctuations is presented. Furthermore, skewness profiles and kurtosis profiles in the convective planetary boundary layer (CBL) including the interfacial layer (IL) are discussed. The results demonstrate that the UHOH RRL resolves the vertical structure of these moments. The data set which is used for this case study was collected in western Germany (50 • 53 50.56 N, 6 • 27 50.39 E; 110 m a.s.l.) on 24 April 2013 during the Intensive Observations Period (IOP) 6 of the HD(CP) 2 (High-Definition Clouds and Precipitation for advancing Climate Prediction) Observational Prototype Experiment (HOPE). We used the data between 11:00 and 12:00 UTC corresponding to 1 h around local noon (the highest position of the Sun was at 11:33 UTC). First, we investigated profiles of the total noise error of the temperature measurements and compared them with estimates of the temperature measurement uncertainty due to shot noise derived with Poisson statistics. The comparison confirms that the major contribution to the total statistical uncertainty of the temperature measurements originates from shot noise. The total statistical uncertainty of a 20 min temperature measurement is lower than 0.1 K up to 1050 m a.g.l. (above ground level) at noontime; even for single 10 s temperature profiles, it is smaller than 1 K up to 1020 m a.g.l. Autocovariance and spectral analyses of the atmospheric temperature fluctuations confirm that a temporal resolution of 10 s was sufficient to resolve the turbulence down to the inertial subrange. This is also indicated by the integral scale of the temperature fluctuations which had a mean value of about 80 s in the CBL with a tendency to decrease to smaller values towards the CBL top. Analyses of profiles of the second-, third-, and fourth-order moments show that all moments had peak values in the IL around the mean top of the CBL which was located at 1230 m a.g.l. The maximum of the variance profile in the IL was 0.39 K 2 with 0.07 and 0.11 K 2 for the sampling error and noise error, respectively. The third-order moment (TOM) was not significantly different from zero in the CBL but showed a negative peak in the IL with a minimum of −0.93 K 3 and values of 0.05 and 0.16 K 3 for the sampling and noise errors, respectively. The fourth-order moment (FOM) and kurtosis values throughout the CBL were not significantly different to those of a Gaussian distribution. Both showed also maxima in the IL but these were not statistically significant taking the measurement uncertainties into account. We conclude that these measurements permit the validation of large eddy simulation results and the...

Improvement of vertical velocity statistics measured by a Doppler lidar through comparison with sonic anemometer observations

“…Machol et al, 2004;Wulfmeyer et al, 2010;Turner et al, 2014a, b), temperature from Raman lidar (e.g. Behrendt et al, 2015), ozone from a DIAL (e.g. Machol et al, 2009;Alvarez II et al, 2011), velocity from Doppler lidars (e.g.…”

“…McNicholas and Turner, 2014) to over 100 s (e.g. Behrendt et al, 2015). Ideally, the smallest lag used in the fitting should correspond to the timescale at which contributions to M 11 from turbulent eddies that cannot be explicitly resolved become negligible.…”

Turbulent Humidity Fluctuations in the Convective Boundary Layer: Case Studies Using Water Vapour Differential Absorption Lidar Measurements

“…The Institute of Physics and Meteorology (IPM) of University of Hohenheim (UHOH) operated its water vapour DIAL system at a site close to the village of Hambach near the research centre Jülich, Germany, at 50 • 53 50.56 N, 6 • 27 50.39 E, 110 m above sea level. In addition to the DIAL, IPM used a rotational Raman lidar for temperature measurements Behrendt et al 2015) and the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) operated its KITcube (Kalthoff et al 2013), a suite of instruments including a Doppler lidar (Träumner et al 2014), at the same site. Radiosondes were launched at this site regularly at 1100 and 2300 UTC during the HOPE campaign and more often during IOPs.…”

Ground-based lidar and microwave radiometry synergy for high vertical resolution absolute humidity profiling

“…Note that this flexible framework allows the retrieval of temperature once corresponding RL and MWR data are available. The method was applied to the 2-month dataset collected during HOPE (HD(CP) 2 Observational Prototype Experiment), where a multitude of groundbased remote sensing instruments for the investigation of boundary layer and cloud processes were operated (Steinke et al, 2015;Behrendt et al, 2015;Foth et al, 2015). Here we focus on clear sky cases and absolute humidity profiles.…”