2022
DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2022.2117277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles of reading mindset and self-efficacy: how are they related to achievement goals, engagement, and reading achievement?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, an individual with a fixed mindset believes that human attributes are innate, or predetermined, such that no amount of effort or determination is likely to drastically alter what an individual can achieve (Dweck & Yeager, 2019). Students endorsing a growth mindset are more likely than those with a fixed mindset to identify themselves as readers as they progress from an amotivational state to a state in which they are developing and maintaining intrinsic motivation as evidenced by their engagement with reading (Cho et al, 2019; Haimovitz et al, 2011; Lee et al, 2022). In a similar vein, students who attribute reading outcomes to internal and relatively malleable factors (e.g., effort, strategy use) believe they have personal agency in their reading development (i.e., rather than attributing reading outcomes to uncontrollable factors such as luck or innate ability).…”
Section: What Is Reading Motivation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, an individual with a fixed mindset believes that human attributes are innate, or predetermined, such that no amount of effort or determination is likely to drastically alter what an individual can achieve (Dweck & Yeager, 2019). Students endorsing a growth mindset are more likely than those with a fixed mindset to identify themselves as readers as they progress from an amotivational state to a state in which they are developing and maintaining intrinsic motivation as evidenced by their engagement with reading (Cho et al, 2019; Haimovitz et al, 2011; Lee et al, 2022). In a similar vein, students who attribute reading outcomes to internal and relatively malleable factors (e.g., effort, strategy use) believe they have personal agency in their reading development (i.e., rather than attributing reading outcomes to uncontrollable factors such as luck or innate ability).…”
Section: What Is Reading Motivation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growth mindset is positively associated with age, such that older children tended to endorse more of the growth mindset (Schroder et al 2017). Lee et al (2022) classified fourth-grade students into three profiles based on mindset, including confident and fixed mindset, moderately confident and neutral mindset, and confident and growth mindset, and found that the confident-and-growthmindset profile showed higher levels of behavioral and cognitive engagement than the moderately-confident-and-neutral-mindset profile in school English/Language Arts grade and vocabulary performance (Lee et al 2022). Therefore, it is critical to offer encouragement for a growth mindset before upper elementary students adopt a fixed perspective.…”
Section: The Difference Of Cogitive Mindset By Grade and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%