2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00049-007-0366-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles of cuticular hydrocarbons mediate male mate choice and sexual isolation between hybridising Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Abstract: Chemical signals frequently underlie sexual isolation between insect species. Our understanding of the evolutionary forces influencing these signaling systems is known for very few systems, challenging both our efforts to understand insect speciation, and our ability to predict longterm changes in the chemical communication systems of insects. Thus, we are in need of more systems in which both the chemical signals causing sexual isolation and the evolutionary forces driving sexual isolation are understood. Sex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used transformed data to conduct a canonical discriminant analysis with leaving-one-out crossvalidation. A multivariate ANOVA was performed to test whether leaf chemistry differs between elm age classes, sites and the interaction between them [50,51].…”
Section: (C) Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used transformed data to conduct a canonical discriminant analysis with leaving-one-out crossvalidation. A multivariate ANOVA was performed to test whether leaf chemistry differs between elm age classes, sites and the interaction between them [50,51].…”
Section: (C) Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While social insects also use CHCs for recognition and interaction with nestmates and as fertility and dominance signals (Singer, 1998;Liebig, 2010), solitary insects mainly use CHCs for the discrimination of conspecifics and enemies, location of mating partners and the elicitation of courtship behaviour (Ruther et al, 2011). Evidence for solitary insects using CHCs as contact sex pheromones comes from several insect orders, for example the Coleoptera (Buprestidae: Lelito et al, 2009;Silk et al, 2009;Cerambycidae: Ginzel, 2010; Chrysomelidae: Sugeno et al, 2006;Peterson et al, 2007;Geiselhardt et al, 2009), Diptera (Drosophilidae, Glossinidae and Muscidae: Wicker- Thomas, 2007;Ferveur & Cobb, 2010) and Hymenoptera (Syvertsen et al, 1995;Schiestl et al, 2000;Sullivan, 2002;Mant et al, 2005;Steiner et al, 2005Steiner et al, , 2006Steiner et al, , 2007. Within the parasitic wasp family Pteromalidae, females of Roptrocerus xylophagorum (Sullivan, 2002), Lariophagus distinguendus (Steiner et al, 2005(Steiner et al, , 2007, Nasonia vitripennis (Steiner et al, 2006) and Dibrachys cavus (Ruther et al, 2011) produce CHCs which act at short-range as contact sex pheromones eliciting courtship behaviour in males.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although difficult to demonstrate, several studies provide evidence for CHCs being involved in prezygotic reproductive isolation (for example, Coyne et al, 1994;Peterson et al, 2007). However, what evolutionary forces cause the divergence of CHCs between populations and how many genes with what functions are involved during this process is still largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%