2002
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.49.2.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles of attribution of importance to life roles and their implications for the work–family conflict.

Abstract: Cluster analysis identified 3 groups of individuals who differed systematically on attributions of relative importance to work and to family roles. Participants were 213 married computer workers and lawyers, 126 men and 87 women. Questionnaires gathered data on attributions of importance to life roles, work-family conflict, spousal and managerial support, and flexibility of working hours. In addition to variation between members of the 3 profiles for level of work-family conflict, differences were also found f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
124
2
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
124
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Asymmetrical spillover effects have been suggested for both genders, with nonwork demands more likely to spill over into work for women and work demands more likely to spill over into personal life for men (Pleck, 1977). Moreover, men and women tend to weigh work and nonwork roles differently (Cinamon & Rich, 2002). We also included age was as a control variable based on previous research on work-life interaction (e.g., Golden, Veiga, & Simsek, 2006) and strain (e.g., Ahuja et al, 2007;Moore, 2000).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymmetrical spillover effects have been suggested for both genders, with nonwork demands more likely to spill over into work for women and work demands more likely to spill over into personal life for men (Pleck, 1977). Moreover, men and women tend to weigh work and nonwork roles differently (Cinamon & Rich, 2002). We also included age was as a control variable based on previous research on work-life interaction (e.g., Golden, Veiga, & Simsek, 2006) and strain (e.g., Ahuja et al, 2007;Moore, 2000).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we conducted post-hoc cluster analysis to explore whether patterns of identity salience across all three roles relate to boundary permeability preferences. Cluster analysis is used to place elements (individuals, groups, or organizations) into clusters to maximize similarity to other elements in the cluster and to maximize differences between elements in other clusters (Eshghi, Haughton, , and clusters of individual importance attributed to work and family roles (Cinamon & Rich, 2002;Cinamon & Rich, 2005). We used SPSS version 22 to conduct two-step cluster analysis, an exploratory technique that has been widely applied in diverse disciplines for its ability to partition (Okazaki, 2006) and handle large datasets (Norusis, 2003).…”
Section: Exploratory Cluster Analysis: Identification Of Role Identitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les rares recherches dont le but était d'identifier des formes de conflits ont utilisé, à notre connaissance, l'analyse typologique pour regrouper les observations en groupes (Demerouti et Geurts, 2004;Moen et Yu, 2000;Cinamon et Rich, 2002). Cette analyse a été utilisée même si elle s'avère moins robuste que l'analyse neuronale basée sur les cartes auto-organisées (Wang, 2001).…”
Section: Analyse Statistiqueunclassified