2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiles of alternative splicing in colorectal cancer and their clinical significance: A study based on large-scale sequencing data

Abstract: BackgroundAlternative splicing (AS), as a potent and pervasive mechanism of transcriptional regulatory, expands the genome's coding capacity and involves in the initiation and progression of cancer. Systematic analysis of alternative splicing in colorectal cancer (CRC) is lacking and greatly needed.MethodsRNA-Seq data and corresponding clinical information of CRC cohort were downloaded from the TCGA data portal. Then, a java application, known as SpliceSeq, was used to evaluate the RNA splicing patterns and ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
84
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(92 reference statements)
7
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we further analyzed the relevant clinical information (such as survival time, survival status, TNM, Age, etc) and found that some related information was not randomly distributed, such as survival status (alive or dead) in 4 clusters. In addition, there were significant differences between T and N. This was similar to the phenomenon found in the study by Xiong and colleagues 38 in rectal cancer. Therefore, we could also identify molecular subtype clusters associated with prognosis through AS events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we further analyzed the relevant clinical information (such as survival time, survival status, TNM, Age, etc) and found that some related information was not randomly distributed, such as survival status (alive or dead) in 4 clusters. In addition, there were significant differences between T and N. This was similar to the phenomenon found in the study by Xiong and colleagues 38 in rectal cancer. Therefore, we could also identify molecular subtype clusters associated with prognosis through AS events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Through data mining, we can also systematically study RNA splicing disorders in cancer. By comparing different alternative splicing events between tumors and adjacent normal tissues, it has been established that survival‐related AS events are associated with a variety of tumors, such as glioblastoma, 35 breast cancer, 36 lung cancer, 37 and colorectal cancer 38 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify AS events with prognostic value that may serve as promising targets, gene network analysis by Cytoscape was performed including the top 300 survival related events, and several AS-related genes such as UBC, STAT3, and FYN were identi ed as hub genes. Then, we attempted to perform unsupervised analysis, which is considered as a better method to predict survival based on AS events [28]. However, the results showed that only one cluster was associated with survival status, which accounted for a small proportion of GBM patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering stable traits and the applicability of risk signatures [26][27][28]31], we developed seven prognostic signatures based on the top three survival-related AS events. The results showed that all the AS-related signatures could signi cantly distinguish the survival status and serve as independent indicators of unfavorable prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aberrant splicing events in CRC and/or other cancer types were identified using either microarray or RNA-seq techniques in the past [14][15][16][17]. The roles of AS in CRC were reported for individual genes: ITGA6 [18], MAP4K4 [19], EPDR1, ZNF518B [20], FIR [21], BRAF [22], Rac1 [23], OCT4 24], RON [25], CD44 [26,27], KRAS [28], ZNF148 [29], FAK [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%