Profiles of Academic Activities and Careers: Does Gender Matter? An Analysis Based on French Life Scientist CVs

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the factors that influence the length of time to promotion for male and female academics. Promotion is defined as elevation to a professorship. We examine the role of academic profiles, which are based not only on publications, but also include activities such as fund raising, consulting, teaching, and managerial appointments (dean of a department for instance). The paper examines the factors that speed up or slow down the progress of an academic career for males and females, respectively, to explore the “glass ceiling” effects. Survival and duration models are used to test whether the gender differential persists after controlling for observed and unobserved heterogeneity. The originality of this paper lies in the use of duration models to track sex differences in promotion criteria. It highlights that the different criteria of promotion for male and female academics: women have to demonstrate higher involvement in different networks in order to be promoted. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006academic, career, glass ceiling, duration model, survival model, life science, mentoring, J4, O3,

Determinants of Success in University Careers: Findings from the German Academic Labor Market / Erfolgsfaktoren in der Wissenschaft – Ergebnisse aus einer Habilitiertenbefragung an deutschen Universitäten

“…The advantages of working together with successful scientists are not restricted to contents but include the dissemination of tacit knowledge (Zuckerman 1977;Long & McGinnis 1985;Leahey 2006;Gross & Jungbauer-Gans 2007). Having worked together with a renowned senior colleague correlates with early productivity (Long & McGinnis 1985;Long 1990), high satisfaction with earnings and occupational careers (Melicher 2000) and the achievement of high positions such as head of department (Sabatier et al 2006). When a young scientist has a mentor, she/he can borrow some of her/ his social capital and receive valuable knowledge.…”

‘A jack of all trades’: the role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation

“…Given, the central role of the PI in collaborative networks, it would appear important that the PIs are heavily burdened with research, teaching and administration activities (Sabatier et al 2006). Engaging in collaborative activities is not highly valued by PIs and when they do engage, their engagement is not significantly rewarded.…”

International temporary mobility of researchers: a cross-discipline study

“…Gaughan and Robin (2004) use survey and CV data of about 800 French and USA physical and life scientists to compare career trends in both countries, including job transitions. Sabatier et al (2006) study the role of mobility in the promotion and career patterns of 583 French life scientists. Fontes (2007) and Jonkers and Tijssen (2008) use CVs and other data sources to assess the connections of international mobility with scientific productivity and collaboration of life scientists in Portugal and China respectively.…”