2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile control in distributed parameter systems using lexicographic optimization based MPC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both linearization of the physics-based models and subspace identification from the data were adopted. On the other hand, nonlinear MPC based on complex physics-based methods, and data-driven methods such as ANN, MLR and PLS, have also been studied [94,97,116,117]. Interestingly enough, the focus shifted along the way from end-point Kappa number control to Kappa number profile control.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Directions Of Pulp Digesters mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both linearization of the physics-based models and subspace identification from the data were adopted. On the other hand, nonlinear MPC based on complex physics-based methods, and data-driven methods such as ANN, MLR and PLS, have also been studied [94,97,116,117]. Interestingly enough, the focus shifted along the way from end-point Kappa number control to Kappa number profile control.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Directions Of Pulp Digesters mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors used a self-organizing map (SOM) to monitor the process and the information was used to switch on the controller or switch it off. Padhiyar and Bhartiya [97] proposed a lexicographic optimization-based MPC that enforces priorities to achieve the blow-line Kappa number target when the target Kappa number profile is unachievable due to model-plant mismatch, unmeasured disturbances and input limitations. Galicia et al [98] showed that the closed-loop performance of PID can be significantly improved by feedbacking Kappa number prediction from a recursive reduced order dynamic PLS model.…”
Section: Kappa Number Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that the target Kappa profile was achievable only in 'normal' conditions and profile may not be achievable in the presence of model-plant mismatch, unmeasured disturbances and input limitations. In a later publication, Padhiyar and Bhartiya [33] proposed a lexicographic optimization-based MPC that enforces priorities to achieve the blow-line Kappa target when the target Kappa profile is unachievable due to the aforementioned reasons. Wisnewski and Doyle [34] analyzed performance of three different MPCs-each employing a different plant model, with varying degrees of complexity-based on their ability to reject stochastic, measured and unmeasured disturbances.…”
Section: Predictive Control Of the Pulp Digestermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MPC, the process dynamics (linear or nonlinear) can be treated as constraints of the optimization, while the multiple control objectives, which are often encountered in industrial processes, are enforced by a set of properly defined objective functions. In Padhiyar and Bhartiya, 29 lexicographic optimization-based MPC was proposed for profile control of plug flow reactors. The controller utilizes lexicographic optimization to prioritize different sections of the profile in case the target profile is unachievable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%